Cognition-Oriented Treatments for Older Adults: a Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Cognition-oriented treatmentscommonly categorized as cognitive training, cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive stimulationare promising approaches for the prevention of cognitive and functional decline in older adults. We conducted a systematic overview of meta-analyses investigating the efficacy of cognition-oriented treatments on cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes in older adults with or without cognitive impairment. Review quality was assessed by A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR). We identified 51 eligible reviews, 46 of which were included in the quantitative synthesis. The confidence ratings were "moderate" for 9 (20%), "low" for 13 (28%) and "critically low" for 24 (52%) of the 46 reviews. While most reviews provided pooled effect estimates for objective cognition, non-cognitive outcomes of potential relevance were more sparsely reported. The mean effect estimate on cognition was small for cognitive training in healthy older adults (mean Hedges' g = 0.32, range 0.13-0.64, 19 reviews), mild cognitive impairment (mean Hedges' g = 0.40, range 0.32-0.60, five reviews), and dementia (mean Hedges' g = 0.38, range 0.09-1.16, seven reviews), and small for cognitive stimulation in dementia (mean Hedges' g = 0.36, range 0.26-0.44, five reviews). Meta-regression revealed that higher AMSTAR score was associated with larger effect estimates for cognitive outcomes. The available evidence supports the efficacy of cognition-oriented treatments improving cognitive performance in older adults. The extent to which such effects are of clinical value remains unclear, due to the scarcity of high-quality evidence and heterogeneity in reported findings. An important avenue for future trials is to include relevant non-cognitive outcomes in a more consistent way and, for meta-analyses in the field, there is a need for better adherence to methodological standards. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018084490.

Effectiveness of the “Mente Sana [Healthy Mind]” Cognitive Training Program for Older Illiterate Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment

“…This can increase independence in daily-life activities, as our authors analyzed [23]. As a result, this study agrees with previous studies [3,8,23,24], reaffirming that older adults with MCI who participated in these studies were able to improve significantly in general cognition and in specific functions, with language being one of the abilities whose training obtained better results as previously evidenced in another work [3]. The cognitive training program Mente Sana [Healthy Mind] shows that it is effective in the treatment group for this study.…”

Predicting Working Memory Training Responsiveness in Parkinson’s Disease: Both “System Hardware” and Room for Improvement Are Needed

“…Moreover, the clinical significance of our results remains a matter of debate, which is not only important in the context of prognostic research for WMT responsiveness, but also regarding general effectiveness of WMT and other CT approaches. 66 Future research on effects and mechanisms of WMT and other CT approaches should more consistently include patient-centered outcomes such as daily life functioning or healthrelated quality of life assessments.…”

Effectiveness of Cognitive Interventions in Older Adults: A Review

“…Cândea et al [21] carried out a review of 32 RCTs of the effect of cognitive intervention on working memory, both in healthy older adults and in older adults with cognitive impairment, finding improvements in the cognitive performance of subjects who had been trained in working memory, without specifying whether this improvement was generalized to overall cognitive functioning. Besides, recent reviews [14,22,23] report scientific evidence for cognitive interventions since engaging in cognitively stimulating activities can be protective for age-related cognitive decline and dementia possibly by increasing cognitive reserve and resilience in later life [14,22,23].…”