2019
DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1603151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognition in patients with traumatic brain injury measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study by Demery et al supports our conclusions: using the TMT-A and TMT-B, the authors compared visuospatial and executive functions between 20 patients with a history of mild TBI, 26 patients with a history of (moderate to) severe TBI, and 24 (age- and sex-matched) healthy controls and found a stepwise deterioration of TMT-A scores and TMT-B scores in patients with mild and patients with (moderate to) severe TBI compared to the scores of the controls [ 22 ]. In another study with 67 TBI patients, the authors found that patients with a higher GCS score, i.e., with a less severe TBI, had better scores on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic, i.e., a better cognitive function [ 27 ]. In a recent study of 15,764 persons aged 50 to 90 years, Lennon et al moreover demonstrated a cumulative effect of TBIs on cognition, particularly on attention and executive function, even decades after the TBIs [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Demery et al supports our conclusions: using the TMT-A and TMT-B, the authors compared visuospatial and executive functions between 20 patients with a history of mild TBI, 26 patients with a history of (moderate to) severe TBI, and 24 (age- and sex-matched) healthy controls and found a stepwise deterioration of TMT-A scores and TMT-B scores in patients with mild and patients with (moderate to) severe TBI compared to the scores of the controls [ 22 ]. In another study with 67 TBI patients, the authors found that patients with a higher GCS score, i.e., with a less severe TBI, had better scores on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic, i.e., a better cognitive function [ 27 ]. In a recent study of 15,764 persons aged 50 to 90 years, Lennon et al moreover demonstrated a cumulative effect of TBIs on cognition, particularly on attention and executive function, even decades after the TBIs [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motor evaluation included the Barthel Index (BI) [ 34 ] to assess the global functional status, the Tinetti Scale (TS) [ 35 ] to evaluate balance and gait recovery, and the MAS [ 36 ] to evaluate spasticity in upper limbs (shoulder, elbow, wrist) and lower limbs (hip, knee, ankle). The neuropsychological assessment included the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) to evaluate depression symptoms [ 37 ], the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to assess the global cognitive status [ 38 ], the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) [ 39 ] to measure the QoL, the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) [ 40 ] for behavioral and mood problems, and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) [ 41 ] to evaluate frontal abilities. In addition, the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI) [ 42 ] was administered to each caregiver to evaluate the emotional burden status (see Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global functioning cognition MoCa g [38] The SF-36 is a generic, multidimensional tool consisting of 36 questions that can be divided into 8 subscales.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To monitor mood changes, we used the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) [31], considering the common occurrence of depressive symptoms in spinal cord injury patients. For an overall assessment of cognitive function, we employed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [32], providing insights into overall cognitive performance. Additionally, we assessed patient satisfaction using the Short Form of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) [33], offering insights into the subjective evaluation of the intervention.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%