Cognition in Context: Understanding the Everyday Predictors of Cognitive Performance in a New Era of Measurement

Abstract

Background Research suggests that variability in attention and working memory scores, as seen across time points, may be a sensitive indicator of impairment compared with a singular score at one point in time. Given that fluctuation in cognitive performance is a meaningful metric of real-world function and trajectory, it is valuable to understand the internal state-based and environmental factors that could be driving these fluctuations in performance. Objective In this viewpoint, we argue for the use of repeated mobile assessment as a way to better understand how context shapes moment-to-moment cognitive performance. To elucidate potential factors that give rise to intraindividual variability, we highlight existing literature that has linked both internal and external modifying variables to a number of cognitive domains. We identify ways in which these variables could be measured using mobile assessment to capture them in ecologically meaningful settings (ie, in daily life). Finally, we describe a number of studies that have already begun to use mobile assessment to measure changes in real time cognitive performance in people’s daily environments and the ways in which this burgeoning methodology may continue to advance the field. Methods This paper describes selected literature on contextual factors that examined how experimentally induced or self-reported contextual variables (ie, affect, motivation, time of day, environmental noise, physical activity, and social activity) related to tests of cognitive performance. We also selected papers that used mobile assessment of cognition; these papers were chosen for their use of high-frequency time-series measurement of cognition using a mobile device. Results Upon review of the relevant literature, it is evident that contextual factors have the potential to meaningfully impact cognitive performance when measured in laboratory and daily life environments. Although this research has shed light on the question of what gives rise to real-life variability in cognitive function (eg, affect and activity), many of the studies were limited by traditional methods of data collection (eg, involving retrospective recall). Furthermore, cognition has often been measured in one domain or in one age group, which does not allow us to extrapolate results to other cognitive domains and across the life span. On the basis of the literature reviewed, mobile assessment of cognition shows high levels of feasibility and validity and could be a useful method for capturing individual cognitive variability in real-world contexts via passive and active measures. Conclusions We propose that, through the use of mobile assessment, there is an opportunity to combine multiple sources of contextual and cognitive data. These data have the potential to provide individualized digital signatures that could improve diagnostic precision and lead to meaningful clinical outcomes in a wide range of psychiatric and neurological disorders.

Unsupervised mobile cognitive testing for use in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

“…In future work, we plan to incorporate additional metrics (e.g., subjective report, environmental factors) to enrich and contextualize cognitive data. 54 …”

The Acute and Chronic Cognitive Effects of a Sage Extract: A Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study in Healthy Humans

“…Why the performance is so depleted in the placebo group is an interesting point. A recent review [ 23 ] demonstrated that both time of day (namely later in the day) and lack of movement were two key predictors of poorer cognition, alongside mood and motivation. As this trial required participants to be sedentary for large periods of time during cognitive task completion and the fact that this continued into the afternoon might simply suggest that sitting for so long was the cause.…”

The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality

“…The evolution of these assessments to focus on non‐traditional metrics such as perception of self, functioning and social life (which research has shown to be particularly important to patients 15 ) provides new opportunities for furthering the potential of active data collection. The use of smartphones for cognitive assessment 16 and for remotely monitoring symptoms 17 also appears feasible, with promising results even for severe mental illness such as schizophrenia 18,19 .…”