2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-67622008000500001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coffee water use in agroforestry system with rubber trees

Abstract: -Water uptake and use by plants are essentially energy processes that can be largely modified by percentage of soil cover, plant type; foliage area and its distribution; phenological stage and several environmental factors. Coffee trees (Coffea arabica -cv. Obatã IAC 1669-20) in Agrforestry System (AFS) spaced 3.4x0.9m apart, were planted inside and along rows of 12-year-old rubber trees (Hevea spp.) in Piracicaba-SP, Brazil (22 42'30" S, 47 38'00" W -altitude: 546m). Sap flow of one-year-old coffee plants ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with those of Marin et al (2003), who established that in the canopy tops, a vertical gradient of irradiance in the canopy is formed through the attenuation of solar radiation, and with the results of Righi et al (2008), who verified a horizontal gradient of irradiance, according to the dimensions of the rocks and the incident angle of the solar radiation.…”
Section: Percentage (%)supporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results are consistent with those of Marin et al (2003), who established that in the canopy tops, a vertical gradient of irradiance in the canopy is formed through the attenuation of solar radiation, and with the results of Righi et al (2008), who verified a horizontal gradient of irradiance, according to the dimensions of the rocks and the incident angle of the solar radiation.…”
Section: Percentage (%)supporting
confidence: 92%
“…All three have previously been demonstrated as optimal cash crops for intercropping with rubber trees based on both ecological and economic profitability (Feng ; Righi et al . ; Snoeck et al . ; Xiao et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abuta racemosa Menispermaceae n/a n/a 12 n/a n/a 579 n/a n/a n/a n/a Panama Meinzer et al, 2005 Acacia gaumeri Fabaceae n/a n/a Annona spraguei Annonaceae n/a N n/a n/a 0.559 37 n/a W n/a n/a Panama Phillips et al, 1999 Antirrhoea trichantha n/a N n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a W D n/a Panama Phillips et al, 1999 Apeiba membranacea Tiliaceae n/a n/a 41 n/a n/a 21 n/a D D n/a Panama Apoplanesia paniculata Fabaceae n/a n/a 9.39 n/a 0. Entada monostachya Fabaceae n/a n/a 25 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/ Eremanthus glomerulatum Compositae n/a N 5.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a W,D E n/a Brazil Bucci et al, 2008 Eriotheca pubescens Bombacaceae n/a N 9.9 n/a n/a n/a n/a W,D BD n/a Brazil Bucci et al,2008 Erythrina Heritiera albiflora Sterculiaceae n/a N 27.7 n/a n/a n/a n/a W,D n/a n/a Brunei Becker et al, 1996 Hevea spp Euphorbiaceae n/a E n/a n/a 0.487 2300 n/a n/a E n/a Brazil Righi et al, 2008 Hopea beccariana Dipterocarpaceae n/a N 31.8 n/a 0.59 n/a n/a W,D n/a n/a Brunei Becker et al, 1996 Hopea Melicope jonesii Rutaceae n/a N n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.5 W n/a 0.0017 Australia McJannet et al, 2007 Miconia argentea Melastomataceae n/a N n/a n/a 0.589 0.08 0.7 D n/a n/a Panama Meinzer et al, 1995 Miconia cuspidata Melastomataceae n/a N n/a n/a n/a 0.1 n/a D E n/a Brazil Gotsch et al, 2010 Miconia ferruginata Melastomataceae n/a n/a 4 n/a n/a 0.54 n/a n/a E n/a Brazil Meinzer et al, 2005 Miconia pohliana Melastomataceae n/a N n/a n/a n/a 0. Pentace adenophora Dipterocarpaceae n/a N 56 n/a n/a n/a n/a W,D n/a n/a Brunei Becker et al, 1996 Pentaclethra macroloba Fabaceae n/a N n/a n/a 0.…”
Section: Country Referencementioning
confidence: 99%