Abstract:Training has shown little effectiveness in altering harassing or discriminatory behavior. Limitations of prior intervention efforts may reflect poor conceptualization of the problems involved, poor training intervention design, approaches that engender cynicism, or misunderstanding psychological principles of attitude and behavior change. Interventions should capitalize on behavioral science models and tools at multiple levels from a broad array of disciplines to explain harassment and bias, and then to defeat… Show more
“…I agree with Hayes et al (2020) that applied psychologists are well equipped to help improve organizations' responses to workplace harassment. However, in doing so, it is important to examine the legal context within which such interventions are implemented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Examination of relevant legal factors highlights further implications regarding many of the topics in the focal article by Hayes et al (2020) and raises important supplemental research considerations. Hence, I explore three examples: the legal definitions of sexual harassment, the legal requirements for remedial action, and the impact of an employee failing to report.…”
Section: Importance Of Understanding Legal Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Hayes et al (2020) pointed out, applied psychologists should consider the relevant continuum of harm and should take a development-focused, rather than compliance-focused, approach in workplace harassment prevention efforts. However, their emphasis on addressing only unlawful harassment unnecessarily constrains the potential scope and impact of training.…”
Section: Elements Of Unlawful Sexual Harassmentmentioning
“…I agree with Hayes et al (2020) that applied psychologists are well equipped to help improve organizations' responses to workplace harassment. However, in doing so, it is important to examine the legal context within which such interventions are implemented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Examination of relevant legal factors highlights further implications regarding many of the topics in the focal article by Hayes et al (2020) and raises important supplemental research considerations. Hence, I explore three examples: the legal definitions of sexual harassment, the legal requirements for remedial action, and the impact of an employee failing to report.…”
Section: Importance Of Understanding Legal Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Hayes et al (2020) pointed out, applied psychologists should consider the relevant continuum of harm and should take a development-focused, rather than compliance-focused, approach in workplace harassment prevention efforts. However, their emphasis on addressing only unlawful harassment unnecessarily constrains the potential scope and impact of training.…”
Section: Elements Of Unlawful Sexual Harassmentmentioning
“…Further, given the impact idiosyncrasy credits may have on decision makers, we must explore viable mechanisms for reducing their influence. Given the evidence regarding training effectiveness in sexual harassment discussed by Hayes et al (2020), we argue that sexual harassment training needs to be reconceptualized and rebuilt if it is to impactfully address complex issues such as power dynamics and idiosyncrasy credits, and create actual organizational change.…”
Section: A Leader Development Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As clearly noted by Hayes et al (2020), sexual harassment remains misunderstood by many, leading to ineffective interventions and, often, failed practices. In line with this thinking, we highlighted two issues, idiosyncrasy credits and power dynamics, which contribute to the complexities of sexual harassment and the difficulty in eliminating it from the workplace.…”
Section: A Leader Development Perspectivementioning
Current approaches to sexual harassment and discrimination training remain limited in their effectiveness due to a series of issues highlighted by Hayes et al. (2020), including poorly designed training programs, a failure to understand the issue, and the misapplication of psychological principles. Additionally, other issues with sexual harassment training have been highlighted in previous volumes of this journal, including inappropriate measurement and a limited lens on shortterm outcomes (Medeiros & Griffith, 2019a) as well as the potential for backlash (Steele & Vandello, 2019). The stakes involved with both sexual harassment and discrimination warrant attention to these issues and a concentrated effort on improving these programs in order to make a real impact. As such, we agree with the perspective presented by Hayes and colleagues, and wish to extend their conversation on the application of psychological principles in sexual harassment interventions by discussing the role of idiosyncrasy credits and the impact of power dynamics in the perpetuation of harassment in the workplace. As per Williams et al. (1999), holding those who engage in sexual harassment accountable is a critical factor in the reduction of workplace sexual harassment. Hayes et al. (2020) note this finding as well, and we believe it warrants additional consideration in the conversation given recent workplace sexual harassment statistics in which HR professionals and employees disagreed significantly regarding the extent to which incidents go unreported (SHRM, 2018). HR professionals endorsed the opinion that unreported incidents are not a major problem nearly twice as often as employees, suggesting that policy makers and enactors are out of step with the experiences of their employees. Available evidence suggests that sexual misconduct goes unreported for reasons ranging from fear of retaliation to a belief that nothing will change (e.g., McLaughlin et al., 2017). Even experimental studies have explored practical workplace implications associated with sexual harassment. For instance, Hart (2019) found that those who evaluated candidates who reported their own sexual harassment were far less likely to recommend them for promotion compared to those who did not mention harassment or had a colleague report on their behalf. Sexual harassment also directly impacts the career choices of women, as those who are sexually harassed are 6.5 times more likely to leave an organization (McLaughlin et al., 2017). These results are mirrored in over 20 years of research on the relationship between sexual harassment and turnover. It would seem, then, that failing to develop and impose consequences on those who engage in sexual harassment results in consequences for those who experience workplace harassment. In light of this, here, we consider two possible barriers to accountability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.