1999
DOI: 10.1124/mol.56.5.955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coexpression with the Inward Rectifier K+Channel Kir6.1 Increases the Affinity of the Vascular Sulfonylurea Receptor SUR2B for Glibenclamide

Abstract: ATP-sensitive K ϩ channels are closed by the hypoglycemic sulfonylureas like glibenclamide (GBC) and activated by a class of vasorelaxant compounds, the K ϩ channel openers. These channels are octamers of Kir6.x and sulfonylurea receptor (SUR) subunits with 4:4 stoichiometry. The properties of the opener-sensitive K ϩ channel in the vasculature are well matched by the SUR2B/Kir6.1 channel; however, the GBC sensitivity of the recombinant channel is unknown. In binding experiments we have determined the affinity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The vascular channel (Kir6.1/SUR2B) is studied only rarely, since it is not readily accessible in the inside-out mode [40]. The IC 50 value for repaglinide in Table 1 (29 nmol/l) is similar to that obtained for the nonvascular smooth muscle channel, Kir6.2/SUR2B, in oocytes (10 nmol/l, [24]); that for glibenclamide agrees with our earlier result [33]. Accepting the values in Table 1, one calculates that repaglinide is ≥30-fold selective for the pancreatic compared with the myocardial and >100-fold compared with the vascular K ATP channel; for glibenclamide, selectivity is ≥1,000.…”
Section: Potency and Efficacysupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vascular channel (Kir6.1/SUR2B) is studied only rarely, since it is not readily accessible in the inside-out mode [40]. The IC 50 value for repaglinide in Table 1 (29 nmol/l) is similar to that obtained for the nonvascular smooth muscle channel, Kir6.2/SUR2B, in oocytes (10 nmol/l, [24]); that for glibenclamide agrees with our earlier result [33]. Accepting the values in Table 1, one calculates that repaglinide is ≥30-fold selective for the pancreatic compared with the myocardial and >100-fold compared with the vascular K ATP channel; for glibenclamide, selectivity is ≥1,000.…”
Section: Potency and Efficacysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Patch-clamp experiments were generally performed in the whole-cell configuration at 37°C as described by Russ et al [33]. The bath was filled with (mmol/l): NaCl, 142; KCl, 2.8; MgCl 2 , 1; CaCl 2 , 1; D(+)-glucose, 11; HEPES, 10; pH 7.4.…”
Section: Patch-clamp Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of Uhde et al (1999) suggests that glibenclamide inhibits P1075 binding and vice versa by an allosteric rather than by a direct competitive interaction, thus corroborating earlier inferences made on the basis of kinetic (Bray & Quast, 1992) and equilibrium binding experiments (Schwanstecher et al, 1992). The allosteric nature of the interaction may explain that the true anity of glibenclamide binding to SUR2B as determined in [ 3 H]-glibenclamide binding assays (Russ et al, 1999) is not obtained in heterologous ([ 3 H]-opener vs glibenclamide) inhibition assays. Furthermore, at higher concentrations, glibenclamide may be able to bind to the SUR2B-opener complex forming a labile ternary (SUR2B-opener-glibenclamide) complex with rapid dissociation of the opener.…”
Section: Interaction Between Glibenclamide and [ 3 H]-pkf217 ± 744supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Firstly, the potency of glibenclamide in this assay was &5 mM, a value close to that obtained with [ 3 H]-P1075 as the radiolabel (K i &2.4 mM; Hambrock et al, 1998). This is two orders of magnitude lower than the K D value determined by homologous displacement from SUR2B (K D &30 nM, Russ et al, 1999;but see DoÈ rschner et al, 1999) or the potency of glibenclamide in blocking the Kir6.1/ SUR2B and the Kir6.2/SUR2B channel (IC 50 &40 nM, DoÈ rschner et al, 1999; Russ et al, 1999). The second result is that glibenclamide increased the dissociation rate of the (Bray & Quast, 1992) and to SUR2B (Hambrock et al, 1998).…”
Section: Interaction Between Glibenclamide and [ 3 H]-pkf217 ± 744mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation