2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.02.801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coexisting lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis is associated with worse knee pain in patients with mild medial osteoarthritis

Abstract: Knees with concomitant lateral and mild medial OA may be more symptomatic compared to those without lateral OA. These findings might help to define a clinically distinct subgroup based on a simple radiographic finding in mild knee OA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(56 reference statements)
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing the weight in kilograms by the square of height in meters. Radiographic OA severity of both knees in each participant was assessed in the anteroposterior short view in the weight-bearing position using the original version of the K&L grading system 7 as described in a previous study 13 . OA severity in the tibiofemoral joint was assessed by an experienced examiner (HI).…”
Section: Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing the weight in kilograms by the square of height in meters. Radiographic OA severity of both knees in each participant was assessed in the anteroposterior short view in the weight-bearing position using the original version of the K&L grading system 7 as described in a previous study 13 . OA severity in the tibiofemoral joint was assessed by an experienced examiner (HI).…”
Section: Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient and physician assessments of therapy response were also determined (evaluation of medication: 0 = none: no good at all, ineffective drug; 1 = poor: some effect, but unsatisfactory; 2 = fair: reasonable effect, but could be better; 3 = good: satisfactory effect with occasional episodes of pain or stiffness; 4 = excellent: ideal response, virtually pain-free) [ 25 ]. Clinically significant improvement was defined as the decrease in pain exceeding 20 mm on the 0–100 mm VAS [ 22 ] and the achievement of at least 20% improvement from baseline with respect to the WOMAC score [ 24 , 26 28 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing the body mass in kilograms by the height in meters squared. Radiographic OA severity and anatomic axis angle (AAA) with sex‐specific correction of both knees were assessed in the anteroposterior short view in the weight‐bearing position, as in a previous study . Knee pain severity and disability level were evaluated using the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM) subcategories of pain and stiffness (8 questions, range 0–32 points) and activities of daily living (10 questions, range 0–40 points) as a person‐specific assessment .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%