“…Of the remaining two cohort studies, one (Balazs et al., 2015) was of moderate quality and the other (Craik and Walsh, 2012) was low (per modified-NOS). Among the 11 arthroscopic excision studies, one RCT had a high risk of bias (Kang et al., 2008), and among the remaining 10 retrospective cohort studies, seven (Aslani et al., 2012; Edwards and Johansen, 2009; Gallego and Mathoulin, 2010; Mathoulin et al., 2004; Rizzo et al., 2004; Shih et al., 2002; Yamamoto et al., 2012) were low quality and three (Chen et al., 2010; Kang et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2013) were moderate quality (Table 1). The average modified NOS score was 5.5 for the two open excision cohort studies, and 5.2 for the 10 arthroscopic excision studies.…”