2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.80.140511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coexistence of incommensurate magnetism and superconductivity inFe1+ySexTe1x

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
165
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(6 reference statements)
13
165
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Static long-range (LR) magnetic order is suppressed as well on Se doping, although short-range (SR) not commensurate AFM fluctuations are still present in samples with x = 0.25 exhibiting a trace of superconductivity, 6 as well as in superconducting samples with x ranging from 0.30 to 0.416. 5,7 Coexistence between incommensurate SR-AFM and superconductivity has been also reported by Khasanov et al [8] in samples with 0.25 ≤ x ≤ 0.40, whereas commensurate magnetic order prevails for x ≤ 0.10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Static long-range (LR) magnetic order is suppressed as well on Se doping, although short-range (SR) not commensurate AFM fluctuations are still present in samples with x = 0.25 exhibiting a trace of superconductivity, 6 as well as in superconducting samples with x ranging from 0.30 to 0.416. 5,7 Coexistence between incommensurate SR-AFM and superconductivity has been also reported by Khasanov et al [8] in samples with 0.25 ≤ x ≤ 0.40, whereas commensurate magnetic order prevails for x ≤ 0.10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…23 In this context it is worth to note that: 1) SR-AFM incommensurate order 5,6,7,8 has been observed in samples with x up to ~0.45, inside which the magnetic volume fractions is strongly dominant (generally exceeding 90%), 8 but characterized by a tetragonal structure at low T; 5,7 2) in both SR and LR-AFM regimes the magnetic wave vector is the same, except for its slight incommensurability in the SR-AFM regime; 3) for pure FeTe the T N obtained by NPD analysis (sensitive only to LR-AFM interactions) and by muon-spin rotation 8 (sensitive also to SR-AFM interactions) is the same, thus suggesting that SR-AFM interactions are absent above the structural transition; 4) the magnetic transition temperatures reported in literature 8 for SR-AFM ordering are in good agreement with those that we obtained for LR-AFM ordering by analysing the neutron thermodiffractograms, as plotted in Figure 13. These facts suggest that LR-AFM order can take place only when the structural transition is not suppressed by Se-substitution in FeTe.…”
Section: Neutron Powder Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic investigation of structural, magnetic, and superconducting properties as a function of both the Se-and Fe-content is mandatory, and is the aim of the present work. Single crystals of Fe 1+x Te 1−y Se y have been recently grown by several authors [15,16,20,21,22] and the role of excess Fe in increasing the charge localization has been recognized [16]. However, little attention has been paid to the actual Fe and Se doping levels in a more realistic 3-D phase diagram, and how different ground states can be driven by Fe and Se doping is not yet understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In others, the two phases coexist in a narrow composition range where the long-range magnetic ordering takes place at temperatures above the superconducting transition [16][17][18]. In iron chalcogenides, on the other hand, an intermediate composition regime exists with short-range magnetic ordering which is characterized by charge carrier localization [19][20][21]. The crossing-over from (π, 0) (defined in the crystallographic Fe 1+y Te lattice) long range order in Fe 1+y Te into a (π, π) magnetic resonance in substituted superconducting Fe 1+y Te 1−x Se x reinforces the view that an intermediate composition regime exists within which short-range magnetic order and superconductivity compete [20,22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inelastic neutron scattering studies on superconducting and non-superconducting Fe 1+y Te 1−x Se x also revealed spin fluctuations dominated by incommensurate excitations [25,26]. The suppression of long range magnetic order and the emergence of a superconducting transition with increase in Se composition have been investigated by various groups [11,19,21,27,28]. The temperature composition phase diagram exhibits three regions, as Se composition increased up to 50%: commensurate AFM order followed by a region where incommensurate AFM order and superconductivity coexist, and bulk superconductivity [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%