2022
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coevolutionary theory of hosts and parasites

Abstract: A wide variety of host defences to parasitism exist in nature, from immune defences such as resistance and tolerance to behavioural defences such as social avoidance and mate choice. These defences exist alongside a plethora of parasitic characteristics (e.g. virulent, avirulent, chronic, acute), life cycles (e.g. one host, multiple hosts) and transmission mechanisms (e.g. airborne, environmental, social, sexual). To explain this diversity requires consideration of how different host and parasite traits have c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 229 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, an interesting and ecologically relevant scenario of biological control using multiple enemies would be the one where some agents are parasites and others are predators 60 , which would combine trophic and parasitic interactions. It would be interesting to include in the model the possibility of co-evolution of the host, for example, by allowing for the evolution of the host resistance under co-infection settings (see the recent review by Buckingham and Ashby 61 and references therein). Including relatedness of parasites (with the possibility of mutation between different parasite strains) and kin selection would be an important extension with several practical applications 46 , 62 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, an interesting and ecologically relevant scenario of biological control using multiple enemies would be the one where some agents are parasites and others are predators 60 , which would combine trophic and parasitic interactions. It would be interesting to include in the model the possibility of co-evolution of the host, for example, by allowing for the evolution of the host resistance under co-infection settings (see the recent review by Buckingham and Ashby 61 and references therein). Including relatedness of parasites (with the possibility of mutation between different parasite strains) and kin selection would be an important extension with several practical applications 46 , 62 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical models have therefore played an important role in shaping our understanding of host-pathogen coevolution. Recently, many theoretical models are constructed to study the coevolutionary theory of host-pathogen interaction, and find that the population dynamics and the genetic basis of infection have a significant impact on the outcome of host-pathogen coevolution (Buckingham and Ashby 2022 ). Baalen ( 1998 ) and Restif and Koella ( 2003 ) investigated the so-called coevolutionary stable state, for which once attained cannot be invaded by other strains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a related study, Prado et al (2009) used a stochastic individual-based network model to show that coevolution between host contact number (degree) and parasite virulence (disease-associated mortality rate) can lead to fluctuating selection in both traits, with the cost of sociality depending both on the virulence of the parasite and its prevalence in the population. However, few theoretical studies have considered how eco-evolutionary feedbacks mediate the evolution of sociality (see Cantor et al 2021 for a review), and as far as we are aware, these are the only two theoretical studies to date to explore the coevolution of sociality and virulence (Buckingham and Ashby 2022). While these studies demonstrate the importance of parasitism as a dynamic cost in the evolution of sociality, both assume that the benefits of sociality are fixed, so that each additional contact increases host fitness by a predetermined amount.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%