2013
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coevolutionary analyses of the relationships between piroplasmids and their hard tick hosts

Abstract: Host–parasite coevolution is a key driver of biological diversity. To examine the evolutionary relationships between piroplasmids and their hard tick hosts, we calculated the molecular clock and conducted phylogenetic analyses of both groups. Based on our results, we conclude that the divergence time of piroplasmids (∼56 Mya) is later than divergence time of their hard tick hosts (∼86 Mya). From analyses of the evolution of both piroplasmid and vector lineages and their association, we know that hard ticks tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), among other diseases. The Plasmodium and Babesia genera are relatively closely related among the apicomplexans (1) (last common ancestor, ϳ55 million years ago [2]) ( Fig. 1A) and share similar features in their biology, including mechanisms for host cell invasion and metabolism (3)(4)(5)(6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), among other diseases. The Plasmodium and Babesia genera are relatively closely related among the apicomplexans (1) (last common ancestor, ϳ55 million years ago [2]) ( Fig. 1A) and share similar features in their biology, including mechanisms for host cell invasion and metabolism (3)(4)(5)(6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 million years ago [23]. Relative to this event, as inferred from the branch lengths in the 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic tree (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus there can be possible difficulties in the study of disease transmission and vector control as proper identification of the vector and understanding of the relationships between closely related species is a must for devising any effective control strategy [14][15][16]. The traditional morphology based identification is sometimes problematic due to variations caused by blood meal [17] and chances of geographical strains of tick species having different vectorial capacity [18][19][20], genetic introgression, fertile hybrids [21][22], and resistance to acaricides [23] are always there. During the past two decades several molecular markers have been used to resolve relationships and solve problems facing systematics of hard ticks in the family Ixodidae [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%