2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.117716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coercivity engineering in Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)12B0.5 thin films by Si grain boundary diffusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…解析などの巨視的な解析手法に加え [20][21][22] ,最近では磁気トモ グラフィー測定による微視的な解析手法も整備されつつあ る [23][24][25] .また,Micromagnetic (MM) シミュレーションも大き な進展を見せており [26][27][28][29][30][31] ,計算機や計算アルゴリズムの進化 に加えて機械学習を導入した高速化,大規模化 [32][33][34] や電子顕 微鏡で得た実際の微細組織構造をモデリングする手法の開 発 [35][36][37] なども進められている. ÁEðM; HÞ ¼ EðM [20][21][22]62)…”
Section: は じ め にunclassified
“…解析などの巨視的な解析手法に加え [20][21][22] ,最近では磁気トモ グラフィー測定による微視的な解析手法も整備されつつあ る [23][24][25] .また,Micromagnetic (MM) シミュレーションも大き な進展を見せており [26][27][28][29][30][31] ,計算機や計算アルゴリズムの進化 に加えて機械学習を導入した高速化,大規模化 [32][33][34] や電子顕 微鏡で得た実際の微細組織構造をモデリングする手法の開 発 [35][36][37] なども進められている. ÁEðM; HÞ ¼ EðM [20][21][22]62)…”
Section: は じ め にunclassified
“…Grain boundary diffusion using non-magnetic elements is expected to improve magnetic properties, and many achievements have been made to improve these properties 14)~17) . For example, Bolyachkin et al reported that the coercivity was increased by infiltration of a Si cap layer into the grain boundary phase of Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)12B0.5 (100 nm) thin film 16) . Then, microstructural observation by cross-sectional STEM-EDS revealed that the penetration depth of the diffused Si was found in a region approximately 25 nm from the top surface of the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)12B0.5 layer 16) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Bolyachkin et al reported that the coercivity was increased by infiltration of a Si cap layer into the grain boundary phase of Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)12B0.5 (100 nm) thin film 16) . Then, microstructural observation by cross-sectional STEM-EDS revealed that the penetration depth of the diffused Si was found in a region approximately 25 nm from the top surface of the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)12B0.5 layer 16) . In addition, micromagnetic simulation based on the results of microstructural observation and magnetic properties predicts that a coercivity of 1.9 T will be obtained when diffused Si reaches 90 nm below the top surface of the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)12B0.5 layer; furthermore, if the formation of soft magnetic phases such as α-Fe or α-(Fe-Co) existing in the initial interface between the V buffer layer and the Sm(Fe0.8Co0.2)12B0.5 layer are suppressed completely, the coercivity will be enhanced to approximately 6.0 T 16) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] ThMn 12 -type SmFe 12 -based permanent magnets have been recognized as the promising one of potential candidates because of their intrinsically high temperature stability of magnetic properties. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] However, because of the metastable enhanced pinning effect of domain walls of magnetic hardening shells. [24,25] For the ThMn 12 -type alloys, Tozman et al recently proposed the first core-shell structure composed of Gd-rich shell and Gd-lean core in the (Sm,Gd)Fe 12 -based alloys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1–4 ] ThMn 12 ‐type SmFe 12 ‐based permanent magnets have been recognized as the promising one of potential candidates because of their intrinsically high temperature stability of magnetic properties. [ 5–11 ] However, because of the metastable characteristics, it still remains a challenge to achieve the single phase structure of SmFe 12 system in bulk magnets. [ 11,12 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%