Coercive commodities and the political economy of involuntary consumption: The case of the gambling industries

Abstract

Coercive commodities are those goods and services that promote ‘akratic’ consumption – that consumption recognised by consumers themselves to be contrary to their own best interests, all things considered. The production of coercive commodities has become an increasingly significant economic project of fractions of the capitalist class. As a form of secondary exploitation, coercive commodities facilitate the extraction of surplus profits from the savings and assets of the working classes, thus impeding the accumulation of a workers’ hoard that may act as a potential blockage to value realisation in consumption. We use the example of commercial gambling to illustrate the political economy of coercive commodity production. The gambling production system is driven by a core dynamic between spatially fixed capital, the pressures of competition, and the technological generation of akrasia. The geographical expression of this dynamic is determined by the contingencies of the ‘harm maximisation’ policies of the state and the political efforts of individual capitalists to gain and reproduce monopoly power. Gambling production is effective as a form of secondary exploitation because, in addition to the profits accrued by exploiting labour, it extracts surplus profits by diverging sale price from value, by harnessing monopoly power, and by increasing the volume of consumption through akrasia. It is this extractive power, amplified by the consumer credit system, that forms the basis of the systemic utility of coercive commodities in late capitalist economies.

‘It's a tradition to go down to the pokies on your 18th birthday’ – the normalisation of gambling for young women in Australia

“…However, there is new evidence emerging that the gambling industry is featuring women in their advertisements on TV and on social media 40,41 . Marketing is an important tool for increasing the demand for products 21,42 . According to the Total Consumption Model, as gambling participation increases, rates of gambling harm will also increase 43 .…”

“…Researchers argue that ‘coercive consumption’ industries such as tobacco, alcohol and gambling, follow a similar playbook of tactics to encourage consumption of their products 19-21 . As such, understanding the range of socio‐cultural factors that shape women's gambling attitudes and behaviours, and how these factors interact with commercial determinants (such as marketing), is critical to developing measures, policies and interventions specifically aimed at preventing the harms posed by these industries 22 …”

Tourism, capital, and the commodification of place

“…hotel, resort, theme park, or casino) may appropriate market share and thus devalorise the capital already fixed in the structure of the original attraction. The implications are that ever more attractive landed tourist commodities must be produced though fixed capital investment, existing fixed capital must be continuously renovated, upgraded and redeveloped, and space is increasingly rationalised to process as many consumers as possible in a given time (Young and Markham, 2017).…”

What is special about gambling? A comparison of public discourse on Finnish state monopolies in rail traffic, gambling, and alcohol

“…However, the operation of gambling has also been argued to differ from other restricted economic sectors in that it produces higher than average economic returns mainly due to a low price of production that is independent of bet sizes, and overconsumption of gambling products by those who play excessively (Young & Markham, 2017). These high economic returns produce significant financial interests and pathdependencies that are often difficult to reverse (Jensen, 2017).…”