2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2007.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coercion and patient satisfaction on psychiatric acute wards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
54
0
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
54
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…A strength of this study is that we examined variables and outcomes that have not been included in previous studies that measured accumulated coercive events (7,14). A limitation of this study is that our sample may be biased because we had a low completion rate for some measures and we could not include individuals with first episode psychosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A strength of this study is that we examined variables and outcomes that have not been included in previous studies that measured accumulated coercive events (7,14). A limitation of this study is that our sample may be biased because we had a low completion rate for some measures and we could not include individuals with first episode psychosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accumulated coercive events algorithm was originally used in a Norwegian psychiatric population to calculate all coercive events for each service user (14). The …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embora o encaminhamento obrigatório esteja fortemente associado à percepção de coerção (Iversen et al, 2007), esta informação aponta para um dado inusitado de que pessoas em atendimento não obrigatório podem sentir-se de alguma forma obrigadas a buscar tratamento, mesmo que não tenham sido formalmente encaminhadas para psicoterapia. Estudos sugerem que nem sempre o uso da coerção é evidente no atendimento obrigatório e que não se pode equipará-lo a uma falta de vontade para o tratamento.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…An accumulated coercive events algorithm was developed by Iversen et al (2007) and it reflects a total level of coercion experienced by an individual during their admission and is based on their legal status, level of perceived coercion and the number of episodes of physical coercion (restraint, seclusion or medication without consent). The algorithm was adapted for use in an Irish setting, the main difference being that the original scale had a section for involuntarily treatment in the community and this does not apply to an Irish setting.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%