1995
DOI: 10.1016/0160-2527(95)00010-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coercion and commitment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we lack data on some variables that could be of importance to the use of involuntary admission, including degree of disability, financial status, employment, educational level, ethnicity, attitudes of doctors, caregivers and patients, etc. [5,6,8,10,23,34,48-51]. The model predicts between 9.0% (Cox & Snell R Square) and 28.7% (Nagelkerke R Square) of the variance in legal status at admission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, we lack data on some variables that could be of importance to the use of involuntary admission, including degree of disability, financial status, employment, educational level, ethnicity, attitudes of doctors, caregivers and patients, etc. [5,6,8,10,23,34,48-51]. The model predicts between 9.0% (Cox & Snell R Square) and 28.7% (Nagelkerke R Square) of the variance in legal status at admission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In Dutch law, however, legal aid extends only to the first phase of the admission; consequently, no one on behalf of the patient is watching the transition from involuntary admission to voluntary hospitalisation [21]. This is worrying as approximately 40%–50% of the patients do not know the legal status of their hospitalisation [22]. Without social support, the relationship between a severely ill psychiatric patient and healthcare services can become problematic.…”
Section: Breakdown Of Continuity Of Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is postulated that the experience of coercion places the therapeutic alliance between clinician and service user in jeopardy by creating mistrust. This mistrust in turn encourages a sense of alienation, which is manifest internally as anger or depression or externally as a negative response to mental health services (Monahan et al, 1995). The latter involves rejection of the psychiatric definition of the "problem," rejection of mental health services, noncompliance with treatment, discontinuity of care in the community, and even the encouragement of others to avoid mental health services.…”
Section: The Potentially Traumatising Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%