2005
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2004.023978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coeliac disease: Table 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
120
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
120
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We agree that the Marsh 2 category is difficult 5 and we generally apply the Corazza definitions both clinically and in this study. We intend that discharge outcomes in our cohort will be the subject of a separate study.…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
“…We agree that the Marsh 2 category is difficult 5 and we generally apply the Corazza definitions both clinically and in this study. We intend that discharge outcomes in our cohort will be the subject of a separate study.…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
“…12,13 Later, Corazza and Villanacci adopted an upper limit of 25 IELs in their new histological classification for coeliac lesions. 25 The guidelines of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition for the diagnosis of CD also stated a limit of 25 IELs/100 enterocytes to define the infiltrative lesion of CD, 4 while the North American Society for Paediatric gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition opted for 30 IELs in their guidelines. 5 Pellegrino et al have declared an even lower threshold of 20, to define elevated IEL counts suggesting a possibility of CD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…79 When an increase in IELs is suspected as the sole marker of intestinal mucosal damage, CD3 staining by immunohistochemistry is a mandatory adjunctive technique needed to count them. 80 It must also be emphasized that non-atrophic lesions of small intestine mucosa (Fig. 1a-b), characterized by an isolated increase in the number of IELs with or without crypt hyperplasia, indicate CD in only 10% of cases because many other conditions can be responsible for an increased number of IELs in the intestinal mucosa, including the following: food allergy, gastrointestinal infection (including Helicobacter pylori infection), Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, common variable immunodeficiency and autoimmune disorders.…”
Section: Diagnostic Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%