2004
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-05362004000100003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coeficientes de variação de algumas características do meloeiro: uma proposta de classificação

Abstract: Uma proposta para classificação dos coeficientes de variação das características: produtividade, peso do fruto, número de frutos, teor de sólidos solúveis, firmeza da polpa, açúcares totais e acidez total titulável foi estabelecida em dados de trabalhos com meloeiro (Cucumis melo L.) conduzidos na cidade de Mossoró. Os valores de CVs foram obtidos de 98 trabalhos, em sua maioria dissertações e monografias defendidas na ESAM. Foram utilizados os métodos de Garcia (1989) e dos Quantis Amostrais. Houve discordânc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
11

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In the classification of Gomes (2000), a CV of 10% is considered as low, whereas in the present study it is considered very high for feed intake, egg production, eggshell thickness, and specific gravity, and very high for the remaining parameters. This stresses the importance of establishing specific CV classifications, as currently proposed for crops (Clemente & Muniz, 2002;Costa et al, 2002;Carvalho et al, 2003;Lima et al, 2004;Oliveira et al, 2009) and animal production (Judice et al, 1999;Judice et al, 2002;Lana et al, 2006;Mohallem et al, 2008), allowing researchers to verify the accuracy of their own results and of those published in literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the classification of Gomes (2000), a CV of 10% is considered as low, whereas in the present study it is considered very high for feed intake, egg production, eggshell thickness, and specific gravity, and very high for the remaining parameters. This stresses the importance of establishing specific CV classifications, as currently proposed for crops (Clemente & Muniz, 2002;Costa et al, 2002;Carvalho et al, 2003;Lima et al, 2004;Oliveira et al, 2009) and animal production (Judice et al, 1999;Judice et al, 2002;Lana et al, 2006;Mohallem et al, 2008), allowing researchers to verify the accuracy of their own results and of those published in literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In a breeding program, CV ranking can be used, for example, to assess the experimental quality of intermediate and final trials of this crop, where one set of traits is measured to aid the breeder in the description and indication of new cultivars (Carvalho et al, 2003). The lower the CV, the greater the homogeneity, and, consequently, the lower the random variation (Lima et al, 2004). The CV estimates fluctuated between 2.74 and 74.79% for NDM and NP1G, respectively ( Table 1).…”
Section: (Equation 9)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esse critério de classificação foi também utilizado em milho (Scapim et al, 1995), soja (Carvalho et al, 2003) e meloeiro (Lima et al, 2004). Quando os CV não satisfazem a pressuposição de distribuição normal, Costa et al (2002) sugeriram a utilização das estatísticas mediana e pseudo-sigma, em substituição à média e ao desvio padrão, respectivamente.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified