2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coefficients of variation for detecting solar-like oscillations

Abstract: Detecting the presence and characteristic scale of a signal is a common problem in data analysis. We develop a fast statistical test of the null hypothesis that a Fourier-like power spectrum is consistent with noise. The null hypothesis is rejected where the local "coefficient of variation" (CV)-the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean-in a power spectrum deviates significantly from expectations for pure noise (CV ≈ 1.0 for a χ 2 2-degrees-of-freedom distribution). This technique is of particular utilit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To extract oscillation parameters characterizing the average properties of the power spectrum, we used several automated analysis methods (e.g., Huber et al 2009;Mathur et al 2010;Benomar et al 2012;Kallinger et al 2012;Mosser et al 2012a;Corsaro & De Ridder 2014;Lundkvist 2015;Stello et al 2017;Campante 2018;Bell et al 2019), many of which have been extensively tested on Kepler data (e.g., Hekker et al 2011;Verner et al 2011). In most of these analyses, the power contributions due to granulation noise and stellar activity were modeled by a combination of power laws and a flat contribution due to shot noise, and then corrected by dividing the power spectrum by the background model.…”
Section: Global Oscillation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extract oscillation parameters characterizing the average properties of the power spectrum, we used several automated analysis methods (e.g., Huber et al 2009;Mathur et al 2010;Benomar et al 2012;Kallinger et al 2012;Mosser et al 2012a;Corsaro & De Ridder 2014;Lundkvist 2015;Stello et al 2017;Campante 2018;Bell et al 2019), many of which have been extensively tested on Kepler data (e.g., Hekker et al 2011;Verner et al 2011). In most of these analyses, the power contributions due to granulation noise and stellar activity were modeled by a combination of power laws and a flat contribution due to shot noise, and then corrected by dividing the power spectrum by the background model.…”
Section: Global Oscillation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extract oscillation parameters characterizing the average properties of the power spectrum, we used several automated analysis methods (e.g. Huber et al 2009;Mathur et al 2010;Mosser et al 2012a;Benomar et al 2012;Kallinger et al 2012;Corsaro & De Ridder 2014;Lundkvist 2015;Stello et al 2017;Campante 2018;Bell et al 2019), many of which have been extensively tested on Kepler data (e.g. Hekker et al 2011;Verner et al 2011).…”
Section: Global Oscillation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain another set of ν max and ∆ν measurements for our data we also determined the seismic parameters using a more efficient technique. The recent work of Bell et al (2019) has shown that ν max can be quickly determined using what is called the coefficient of variation, or CV. The coefficient of variation is the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean of the power spectrum.…”
Section: Coefficient Of Variation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that our implementation of the CV method is not identical to that of Bell et al (2019). This is necessary because the Bell et al (2019) CV method was designed for red giant stars, using long-cadence light curves, while our sample also contains main sequence and subgiant stars that have short-cadence data.…”
Section: Coefficient Of Variation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation