1999
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.59.2361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coefficient of restitution for elastic disks

Abstract: We calculate the coefficient of restitution, ǫ, starting from a microscopic model of elastic disks. The theory is shown to agree with the approach of Hertz in the quasistatic limit, but predicts inelastic collisions for finite relative velocities of two approaching disks. The velocity dependence of ǫ is calculated numerically for a wide range of velocities. The coefficient of restitution furthermore depends on the elastic constants of the material via Poisson's number. The elastic vibrations absorb kinetic ene… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
75
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[1,3,11] We also recognize that the restitution coefficient can be less than unity for head-on collisions without any introduction of explicit dissipation, because the macroscopic inelasticities originate in the transfer of the energy from the translational mode to the internal modes such as vibrations. [7,12,13] Although it is believed that the restitution coefficient for head-on collisions is smaller than unity, the restitution coefficient can be larger than unity in oblique collisions. [14,15,16] For example, Louge and Adams observed such an anomalous impact in which the restitution coefficient is larger than unity in oblique collisions of a hard aluminum oxide sphere onto a thick elastoplastic polycarbonate plate in which the restitution coefficient increases monotonically with the increase of the magnitude of the tangent of the angle of incidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,3,11] We also recognize that the restitution coefficient can be less than unity for head-on collisions without any introduction of explicit dissipation, because the macroscopic inelasticities originate in the transfer of the energy from the translational mode to the internal modes such as vibrations. [7,12,13] Although it is believed that the restitution coefficient for head-on collisions is smaller than unity, the restitution coefficient can be larger than unity in oblique collisions. [14,15,16] For example, Louge and Adams observed such an anomalous impact in which the restitution coefficient is larger than unity in oblique collisions of a hard aluminum oxide sphere onto a thick elastoplastic polycarbonate plate in which the restitution coefficient increases monotonically with the increase of the magnitude of the tangent of the angle of incidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For high velocity of the impact they demonstrate the macroscopic deformation has left after the collision is over. Although it is not easy to discuss the impact with the very low impact velocity from their method, their analysis may suggest the possibility of a complicated relation between the quasi-static theory of impact 14,15,16 and their microscopic simulation 18 . Thus, we have to clarify the relation between two typical approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should note that the strong repulsion F(l (i) s ) is introduced to inhibit the penetration of the disk to the surface of the wall [5]. Thus, the dynamical equation of motion for each mass point i of the lower half boundary of the disk is described by…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%