The Biology of Acinetobacter 1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-3553-3_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Codon Usage in Acinetobacter Structural Genes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Codon usage and codon base composition of the esterase gene are similar to what has been calculated as the average for 20 Acinetobacter genes by White et al (1991). The esterase gene has a combined A + T composition at codon positions one, two and three of 44~9,616 and 66.3 mol %, respectively, exactly matching calculations by White et al (1991).…”
Section: Sequence Analysis Of the Esterase Encoding Regionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Codon usage and codon base composition of the esterase gene are similar to what has been calculated as the average for 20 Acinetobacter genes by White et al (1991). The esterase gene has a combined A + T composition at codon positions one, two and three of 44~9,616 and 66.3 mol %, respectively, exactly matching calculations by White et al (1991).…”
Section: Sequence Analysis Of the Esterase Encoding Regionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The esterase gene has a combined A + T composition at codon positions one, two and three of 44~9,616 and 66.3 mol %, respectively, exactly matching calculations by White et al (1991). The overall A + T content of the esterase gene (60 mol%), is also in agreement with the A + T content of the Acinetobacter genome (55-62 mol% ; Henriksen, 1976).…”
Section: Sequence Analysis Of the Esterase Encoding Regionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The pcaG and -H genes from six such transformants, independently derived with six different PCRs, were sequenced, and a point mutation creating an amino acid substitution was found in pcaG in each case. In two cases, the intragenic suppressor mutation was Leu 39 to Phe 39 , created by changing TTG to TTT, and in the remaining cases, Gln 93 to His 93 was created, three times by a CAA to CAC change and once by a CAA to CAT change. In order to confirm that the sequenced second-site mutation was the cause of suppression, PCR amplification across both mutations in the suppressed strains was used to create DNA that gave rise to over 1,000 times more transformants of the parental strain than in the initial selection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5B). Use of AGA as a codon is quite infrequent in Acinetobacter structural genes (39), and the presence of the codon in transcriptional activators might be regarded as the result of selection for reduced expression of these genes by translational control (3). Alternatively, the unusual codons may simply have been accepted in transcriptional activators because there has been no demand for elevated expression of these genes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It contains three open reading frames (ORFs) (Fig. 1), each of which is preceded by a putative ribosome binding site, as judged by sequence comparison with other Acinetobacter genes (38). Transformation of plasmids obtained from a nested-deletion reaction of pWH1597 mapped the complementing fragment within ORF3 (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%