1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02174182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Codon adjustment to maximise heterologous gene expression inStreptomyces lividans can lead to decreased mRNA stability and protein yield

Abstract: The impact of the codon bias of the mouse tumour necrosis factor alpha (mTNF) gene cloned in Streptomyces lividans on the efficiency of expression and secretion was analysed. Minor codons occurring in the mTNF gene were therefore adapted to the codon bias of Streptomyces by site-directed mutagenesis. No improvement in mTNF yield could be detected. The stability of the transcript derived from the construct was shown to be more important for determining the final level of mTNF production. A strong correlation wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides codon bias, RNA secondary structure is another important factor restructured by codon change and represents significant effects on heterologous gene expression and hence should be placed under great observation during codon optimization. Lower folding energies (higher stability) slow down the ribosome and decrease translation efficiency (Lammertyn et al 1996;Tuller et al 2010). On the other hand, it appears that codon bias in lower eukaryotes tends towards A+T (Sinclair and Choy, 2002).…”
Section: Fig 5 Graphs Related To Comparison Of Secreted and Intracelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Besides codon bias, RNA secondary structure is another important factor restructured by codon change and represents significant effects on heterologous gene expression and hence should be placed under great observation during codon optimization. Lower folding energies (higher stability) slow down the ribosome and decrease translation efficiency (Lammertyn et al 1996;Tuller et al 2010). On the other hand, it appears that codon bias in lower eukaryotes tends towards A+T (Sinclair and Choy, 2002).…”
Section: Fig 5 Graphs Related To Comparison Of Secreted and Intracelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Increased resistance against infection can be achieved in two ways: by (1) biasing the anticodons of the host tRNA pool away from the parasite codon set through reduced anticodon-codon binding specificity, or (2) modifying the copy number of a tRNA anticodon required by the parasite. These strategies can be effective as the translation of highly expressed parasite genes requires large numbers of complementary anticodons in the host (Bennetzen & Hall, 1982;Kurland, 1991;Lammertyn et al, 1996). Modifying anticodons and tRNA availabilities restrict virus genomes access to host protein-synthesis machinery.…”
Section: Translational Parasitismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of rare codons would be expected to have a similar effect on mRNA stability as slowing ribosomes, and in fact, most studies show that the removal of rare codons stabilizes mRNA (Comer et al, 1996; Deana et al, 1996; Gursky and Beabealashvilli, 1994; Makoff et al, 1989). However, since rare codons result in a localized retardation of ribosome movement on mRNA as compared to bulk translation slowing by antibiotics, the removal of rare codons does not always result in mRNA stabilization but can also result in decreased mRNA stability (Lammertyn et al, 1996). These seemingly conflicting experimental observations can be explained by the location of the rare codons with respect to the mRNA cleavage positions.…”
Section: Mrna Stability Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%