2008
DOI: 10.1080/10635150802169610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Codivergence in Heteromyid Rodents (Rodentia: Heteromyidae) and Their Sucking Lice of the Genus Fahrenholzia (Phthiraptera: Anoplura)

Abstract: Although most studies of codivergence rely primarily on topological comparisons of host and parasite phylogenies, temporal assessments are necessary to determine if divergence events in host and parasite trees occurred contemporaneously. A combination of cophylogenetic analyses and comparisons of branch lengths are used in this study to understand the host-parasite association between heteromyid rodents (Rodentia: Heteromyidae) and their sucking lice of the genus Fahrenholzia (Phthiraptera: Anoplura). Cophylog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rezende et al 2007). In strict co-cladogenesis, for example, host and parasite (or mutualist and partner) phylogenies match identically or nearly so (Light & Hafner 2008). Additionally (and just as for hosts), the traits related to host specificity may be conserved phylogenetically, such that even if host extinction were phylogenetically random, affiliate extinction might not be.…”
Section: Consequences (Why Should We Care?)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rezende et al 2007). In strict co-cladogenesis, for example, host and parasite (or mutualist and partner) phylogenies match identically or nearly so (Light & Hafner 2008). Additionally (and just as for hosts), the traits related to host specificity may be conserved phylogenetically, such that even if host extinction were phylogenetically random, affiliate extinction might not be.…”
Section: Consequences (Why Should We Care?)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their importance as a model organism in hostÐparasite studies, very few loci have been targeted for sequencing in parasitic lice. A large number of studies have been published on the molecular phylogenetics of parasitic lice (Hafner et al 1994;Page et al 1998Page et al , 2004Cruickshank et al 2001;Johnson et al 2001aJohnson et al ,b, 2002aJohnson et al ,b, 2003Johnson et al , 2007Weckstein 2004;Banks et al 2005;Light and Hafner 2008;Š tefka and Hypsa 2008;Bueter et al 2009;Light et al 2010;Š tefka et al 2011), but most of these studies have only used short fragments of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit-1 (CO1) and nuclear elongation factor-1 alpha (EF-1␣) for phylogenetic analysis. The generally small amount of data in these studies makes resolving many of the branches in the phylogenetic tree difÞcult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If cospeciation was the driving force of parasite diversification, one would expect that all mammals in a clade would be infected by parasites that are phylogenetically related, which is seldom the case (Light & Hafner 2008). The expectation of encountering mirroring or concordant phylogenies is based on two premises: (1) that species of permanent parasites are extremely host-specific, specializing in resources exclusively available on their host species; and (2) that parasites are able to transmit among potential hosts via contact and they are able to complete their life cycle without leaving the host body.…”
Section: Historical Associations: Does Cospeciation Explain the Distrmentioning
confidence: 99%