2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39200-0_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coding of Static Information in Terrestrial Mammal Vocal Signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formant measures (ΔF and apparent VTL) taken from central vowel frequencies in honest vocal signals explained between 14% and 40% of the variance in actual height within sexes, whereas f o explained virtually none (<3%; Supplementary Table 4). These findings corroborate studies on several other terrestrial mammals 26,27 including humans (see the meta-analysis in ref. 34 ), where formants but not f o are anatomically constrained and thus follow a degree of acoustic allometry (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Formant measures (ΔF and apparent VTL) taken from central vowel frequencies in honest vocal signals explained between 14% and 40% of the variance in actual height within sexes, whereas f o explained virtually none (<3%; Supplementary Table 4). These findings corroborate studies on several other terrestrial mammals 26,27 including humans (see the meta-analysis in ref. 34 ), where formants but not f o are anatomically constrained and thus follow a degree of acoustic allometry (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This could be expected based on our acoustic analyses indicating reliable formant-based cues to actual size in deceptive vocal signals (Supplementary Table 4). As further predicted, listeners generally associated lower absolute voice frequencies with larger size, a wellestablished perceptual association 25,27,36,37 . However, this association was stronger for exaggerated than honest or attenuated signals (Supplementary Table 6).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations