2015
DOI: 10.1090/tran/6421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coding multitype forests: Application to the law of the total population of branching forests

Abstract: Abstract. By extending the breadth rst search algorithm to any d-type critical or subcritical irreducible branching forest, we show that such forests may be encoded through d independent, integer valued, d-dimensional random walks. An application of this coding together with a multivariate extension of the Ballot Theorem which is proved here, allow us to give an explicit form of the law of the total progeny, jointly with the number of subtrees of each type, in terms of the ospring distribution of the branching… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of Theorem 3.1 relies on two arguments. The first one is a generalization of the Dwass formula for multi-type GW processes given by Chaumont and Liu [5] which encodes critical or sub-critical d-multi-type GW forests using d random walks of dimension d. The second one is the strong ratio theorem for random walks in Z d , see Theorem 4.7, which generalizes a result by Neveu [18] in dimension one. The proof of the strong ratio theorem relies on a uniform version of the d-dimensional local theorem of Gnedenko [7], see also Gnedenko and Kolmogorov [8] (for the sum of independent random variables), Rvaceva [22] (for the sum of d-dimensional i.i.d.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The proof of Theorem 3.1 relies on two arguments. The first one is a generalization of the Dwass formula for multi-type GW processes given by Chaumont and Liu [5] which encodes critical or sub-critical d-multi-type GW forests using d random walks of dimension d. The second one is the strong ratio theorem for random walks in Z d , see Theorem 4.7, which generalizes a result by Neveu [18] in dimension one. The proof of the strong ratio theorem relies on a uniform version of the d-dimensional local theorem of Gnedenko [7], see also Gnedenko and Kolmogorov [8] (for the sum of independent random variables), Rvaceva [22] (for the sum of d-dimensional i.i.d.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Pre-existing immunity in older age groups can alter this pattern [22], making it possible to separate the reproduction number into its pathogen-and population-specific components. We made use of this observation by developing a novel agestructured model of stuttering transmission chains, which combined reported social contact data with a multi-type branching process [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If m > 0, we had[24], Pðn; m; a 21 ; a 12 Þ ¼ a 21 T n 11 ðn À a 12 À 1ÞT n 21 ða 21 ÞT m 12 ða 12 ÞT m 22 ðm À a 21 Þ nm :…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that certain specializations of that reduced polynomial coincide, among others, with the Grothendieck polynomials corresponding to the permutation 1 × w (n−1) 0 ∈ S n , the Lagrange inversion formula, as well as give rise to combinatorial (i.e., positive expressions) multiparameters deformations of Catalan and Fuss-Catalan, Motzkin, Riordan and Fine numbers, Schröder numbers and Schröder trees. We expect (work in progress) a similar connections between Schubert and Grothendieck polynomials associated with the Richardson permutations 1 k × w (n−k) 0 , k-dissections of a convex (n + k + 1)-gon investigated in the present paper, and k-dimensional Lagrange-Good inversion formula studied from combinatorial point of view, e.g., in [22,50].…”
Section: Ch : 6tmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…22. The value N n (4) of the Narayana polynomial at β = 4 has the following combinatorial interpretation: N n (4) is equal to the number of different lattice paths from the point (0, 0) to that (n, 0) using steps from the set Σ = {(k, k) or (k, −k), k ∈ Z >0 }, that never go below the x-axis, see [131, A059231].…”
Section: Comments 519 (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%