1976
DOI: 10.1177/002202217672007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coding and Drawing of Simple Geometric Stimuli by Bukusu Schoolchildren in Kenya

Abstract: Bukusu schoolboys were asked to draw a cube and a tetrahedron, the stimulus being either in a form of a skeleton solid or its picture. Two response conditions were used: in one, subjects drew the drawing with model present; in the other, they drew after it had been removed from sight. No significant difference was observed between the responses made to the model, whether from recall or with model present. This finding also applied to drawings of a tetrahedron but not to drawings of a cube which, when time laps… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When drawing objects children tend to rely on a 'meaningful' code; they attempt to reproduce objects 'as they know them', relying on the 'content-directed' strategy (Chen & Cook, 1984), the drawings displaying, according to Phillips et al (1978), intellectual realism. These observations parallel those of Deregowski (1976), who argued that children did perceive depth in drawings of simple geometric figures because the drawings which they made from memory of a picture were similar to those which they made when drawing from a solid model and differed from those which were made by simply copying. Phillips et al, who evaluated responses by comparing them with responses made to abstract geometric patterns, found the effect even in copied drawings.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…When drawing objects children tend to rely on a 'meaningful' code; they attempt to reproduce objects 'as they know them', relying on the 'content-directed' strategy (Chen & Cook, 1984), the drawings displaying, according to Phillips et al (1978), intellectual realism. These observations parallel those of Deregowski (1976), who argued that children did perceive depth in drawings of simple geometric figures because the drawings which they made from memory of a picture were similar to those which they made when drawing from a solid model and differed from those which were made by simply copying. Phillips et al, who evaluated responses by comparing them with responses made to abstract geometric patterns, found the effect even in copied drawings.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…This finding suggests that children may choose or intend to draw in accordance with their own understanding of an object's properties, derived from whatever experience they have had with it, in order to produce a maximally informative picture. This tendency may be heightened in situations where there is no 'conventional' drawing of the object provided to aid the subject's copying (Deregowski, 1976) and it appears to persist well beyond the point at which knowledge-dominated drawings have been held to predominate. However, to the extent that the older children appeared to be more sensitive to the need to represent the objects from their particular perspective, they may have been more prepared to conform to adult-imposed notions of what constitutes a 'good' drawing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Etuk [84] examined Piaget's theory with Yoruba children (Nigeria). Other psychologists have shown interest in the cultural context underlying the understanding of pictorial spatial relationships (pictorial depth perception), model-making and drawing in Kenya [57,59], Nigeria [224], and Zimbabwe [60,191,192]. Cross-cultural psychologists have also examined symmetry and pattern reproduction in Ghana [159], Kenya [26], and Zambia [56,58] (see also [283]) and in orientation and rotation of symmetry in drawings [266,268].…”
Section: Studies In Related Disciplinesmentioning
confidence: 99%