1981
DOI: 10.1017/s0305004100058941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Codimension one immersions and the Kervaire invariant one problem

Abstract: IntroductionLet i : M<\ > U n+1 be a self-transverse immersion of a compact closed smootĥ -dimensional manifold in (n+ 1)-dimensional Euclidean space. A point of U n+1 is an r-fold intersection point of the immersion if it is the image under i of (at least) r distinct points of the manifold. The self^transversality of i implies that the set of r-fold intersection points is the image of an immersion of a manifold of dimension n+l-r (the empty set if r > n+ 1). In particular, the set of (n+ l)-fold intersection … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main result which is claimed in the preprints [16], [17] and [18] is that the stable homotopy classes with Arf-Kervaire invariant one (modulo 2) exist only in a finite, unspecified range of dimensions. The immersion interpretation dates back to work in the 1980's by Peter Eccles ([74], [75], [76]; see also [19] and [20]). The method of attack adopted in ( [16], [17], [18]) interprets the Arf-Kervaire invariant in terms of counting certain multiple points of immersions and features an invariant given by a formula similar to that of Theorem 2.2.3.…”
Section: 216mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main result which is claimed in the preprints [16], [17] and [18] is that the stable homotopy classes with Arf-Kervaire invariant one (modulo 2) exist only in a finite, unspecified range of dimensions. The immersion interpretation dates back to work in the 1980's by Peter Eccles ([74], [75], [76]; see also [19] and [20]). The method of attack adopted in ( [16], [17], [18]) interprets the Arf-Kervaire invariant in terms of counting certain multiple points of immersions and features an invariant given by a formula similar to that of Theorem 2.2.3.…”
Section: 216mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider an approach to a solution of this problem based on results of P. J. Eccles (see [8]). For a geometrical approach, see also [5,6].…”
Section: Self-intersections Of Immersions and Kervaire Invariantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to state the main result it is necessary to review some of these ideas and to explain how the number of triple points of an immersion can be viewed as a bordism invariant. Further details may be found in [5,6,7].…”
Section: Theorem There Is a Self-transverse Immersion M 2n Q'^u Zn Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is homotopy theoretic; explicit manifolds and immersions are not constructed.In order to state the main result it is necessary to review some of these ideas and to explain how the number of triple points of an immersion can be viewed as a bordism invariant. Further details may be found in [5,6,7].Given a self-transverse immersion /: M 2 "^ <*+ |R 3n of a closed oriented 2w-manifold, compactness ensures that the number of triple points is finite. If n is even a sign may be attached to each triple point by comparing the standard orientation of IR 3n with that provided by the orientation of the three normal planes at that point.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%