Codicological Features of a Late-Eleventh-Century Manuscript of the Lombard Laws

Gobbitt, Thomas

doi:10.1080/00393274.2013.853899

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

(2 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This reverses the traditional argument that the barbarian laws were being used as a means to better understand the Roman law (96). Examination of the production and use of the manuscript of the Liber Legis Langobardorum in the later 11th and 12th centuries shows that the scribes carefully selected and adapted the content and presentation of the texts as much as the underlying physical, material form of the manuscripts in which they were copied and used (see Ciaralli 99; Radding and Ciaralli, 23, 90; Gobbitt, Codicological Features’).…”

Section: Legal Historymentioning

confidence: 99%

(Old) English, Anglo‐Saxon Legal Texts in the Later 11th to Mid‐12th Centuries

Gobbitt

2013

Literature Compass

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Manuscripts containing English language copies of Anglo‐Saxon laws and related texts continued to be produced and used well into the mid‐12th century. Interpretations of the underling manuscript contexts prevalent in the scholarship have tended to prioritise the Conquest as the defining feature underlying their production and use. Such interpretations assume that the collation of a wide range of Anglo‐Saxon legal texts into a single manuscript context was a direct result of Norman rulers struggling to understand their newly acquired realm. This article reassesses the impact of the Conquest on the manuscript contexts of Anglo‐Saxon law, by reviewing the extant scholarship on the surviving manuscripts, the role of the vernacular in the 12th century, and on legal history relating to Anglo‐Saxon law in the period. Case studies of the scribal augmenting and updating of a turn of the 12th century manuscript collection of the laws are examined. Through these case studies, I illustrate the extent of scribal agency in the subtle adaption of the materiality and mise‐en‐page of the laws in their manuscript contexts. I argued for a manuscript‐led approach to the study of Anglo‐Saxon laws and related texts produced and used in the later 11th and first half of the 12th centuries.

show abstract

Section: Legal Historymentioning

confidence: 99%