2018 2nd International Conference on Telematics and Future Generation Networks (TAFGEN) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/tafgen.2018.8580480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coded Random Access Prioritizing Human Over Machines for Future IoT Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A study conducted by Ni'amah et al (2018) prioritizes the human group with 10:90 utility function user, which means that from a total of 100 users, the human group consists of 10 users and the machine group…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A study conducted by Ni'amah et al (2018) prioritizes the human group with 10:90 utility function user, which means that from a total of 100 users, the human group consists of 10 users and the machine group…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1:0.8 utility function time-slot means that the human user group can access the entire time-slot while the machine group can only access 80% of the existing number of time-slot. Ni'amah et al (2018) do not use fading which results in human group rate of 0.073 and machine group of 0.33. For PLR 10-3 offered traffic, the result obtained is 0.7 packets/slot for the human group and 0.23 packets/slot for the machine group.…”
Section: Low Latency Communications Massive Machine Type Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations