2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2012.6551183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Code-density calibration of Nyquist-rate analog-to-digital converters

Abstract: An analog-to-digital converter (ADC) calibration algorithm based on measuring and correcting the code-density histogram of the converter under calibration is presented. The algorithm constructs a histogram of the ADC response to a linear ramp and stores the calculated correction coefficients in a lookuptable. By leveraging circuit density improvements in deep submicron CMOS technology, the algorithm is able to provide substantive improvements to ADC static linearity performance at low silicon cost. The algorit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different from the average calibration method, the delay time of each delay cell can be calculated through the code density test. The principle of the code density test in TDC is similar to that in ADC [ 31 ]. The difference is that the code density test in ADC is the quantitative statistical analysis of voltage with random amplitude, while the code density test in TDC is the quantitative statistics with completely random time intervals.…”
Section: Calibration Algorithm Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from the average calibration method, the delay time of each delay cell can be calculated through the code density test. The principle of the code density test in TDC is similar to that in ADC [ 31 ]. The difference is that the code density test in ADC is the quantitative statistical analysis of voltage with random amplitude, while the code density test in TDC is the quantitative statistics with completely random time intervals.…”
Section: Calibration Algorithm Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%