1985
DOI: 10.1109/tcom.1985.1096314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Code Combining--A Maximum-Likelihood Decoding Approach for Combining an Arbitrary Number of Noisy Packets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
366
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 819 publications
(373 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
366
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideal channel estimation is assumed, and required CSI is assumed to be available at each node to calculate FDE weights. Chase combining [12] and incremental redundancy [20] are used for the HARQ strategy. Except in Fig.…”
Section: A Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ideal channel estimation is assumed, and required CSI is assumed to be available at each node to calculate FDE weights. Chase combining [12] and incremental redundancy [20] are used for the HARQ strategy. Except in Fig.…”
Section: A Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tx/Rx FDE weights are jointly designed based on the minimum mean-square-error (MMSE) criterion under the transmit power constraint. In [10] and [11], an extension of joint Tx/Rx FDE to hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) with chase combining [12] was presented; the Tx/Rx FDE weights, which jointly minimize the mean square error (MSE) after packet combining at the receiver side, are applied to the packet upon each request of packet retransmission. It was shown that the joint Tx/Rx FDE is effective in obtaining a higher packet combining gain and improves the throughput performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of r ′ 1 is not only dependent on the channel quality during the retransmission phase, but also on the residual errors e 2 resulting from the difference betweenĉ 2 and c 2 . r ′ 1 is then combined using MRC with r 1 and the resultant information is hard demodulated then decoded to obtainb 1 .…”
Section: B Receiver Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The receiver then combines the packet that was not correctly decoded with subsequent retransmission(s) of that same packet, resulting in a combined packet that is more reliable to decode than any of its constituents. Two variants of HARQ with soft combining exist: Chase combining (CC) [1] and incremental redundancy (IR) [2]. In the case of CC, the retransmitted packet is identical to the original transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we propose a novel Hybrid ARQ cooperative scheme, referred to as cooperative partial retransmission (CPR), in which the relay retransmits only a fraction of the original message when the destination requests a retransmission. The system operates under the incremental DF (IDF) cooperative protocol using Type-I HARQ with chase combining (CC) [19]. The option for Type-I HARQ with chase combining is supported by some recent results [20][21][22], which demonstrate that Type-I HARQ may perform very close to Type-II HARQ (incremental redundancy-IR) with a considerably smaller computational complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%