Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-006-0086-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coda Q in the Kachchh Basin, Western India Using Aftershocks of the Bhuj Earthquake of January 26, 2001

Abstract: Q C -estimates of Kachchh Basin in western India have been obtained in a high frequency range from 1.5 to 24.0 Hz using the aftershock data of Bhuj earthquake of January 26, 2001 recorded within an epicentral distance of 80 km. The decay of coda waves of 30 sec window from 186 seismograms has been analysed in four lapse time windows, adopting the single backscattering model. The study shows that Q c is a function of frequency and increases as frequency increases. The frequency dependent Q c relations obtained … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Q estimates obtained in the present analysis for the Saurashtra region (Q c = 170f 0.97 for Junagarh; Q c = 224f 0.98 for Jamnagar; lapse time: 30 s) are found to be higher as compared to that of estimated for the Kachchh region (Q c = 102f 0.98 by MANDAL et al, 2004; Q c = 106f 1.11 by GUPTA et al, 2006 and Q c = 148f 1.01 by BABITA et al, 2008). This shows that there is a low level of heterogeneity for the Saurashtra region as compared to that of the adjacent Kachchh region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Q estimates obtained in the present analysis for the Saurashtra region (Q c = 170f 0.97 for Junagarh; Q c = 224f 0.98 for Jamnagar; lapse time: 30 s) are found to be higher as compared to that of estimated for the Kachchh region (Q c = 102f 0.98 by MANDAL et al, 2004; Q c = 106f 1.11 by GUPTA et al, 2006 and Q c = 148f 1.01 by BABITA et al, 2008). This shows that there is a low level of heterogeneity for the Saurashtra region as compared to that of the adjacent Kachchh region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The coda-Q estimates of the nearby Kachchh region in the north of the Saurashtra region are available (MANDAL et al, 2004;GUPTA et al, 2006 andBABITA et al, 2008). The Q estimates obtained in the present analysis for the Saurashtra region (Q c = 170f 0.97 for Junagarh; Q c = 224f 0.98 for Jamnagar; lapse time: 30 s) are found to be higher as compared to that of estimated for the Kachchh region (Q c = 102f 0.98 by MANDAL et al, 2004; Q c = 106f 1.11 by GUPTA et al, 2006 and Q c = 148f 1.01 by BABITA et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12). The relation obtained from the present study shows the attenuation characteristics close to the NW Himalayan region (KUMAR et al, 2005) and Kachchh Basin (GUPTA et al, 2006), which are seismically active regions. A further comparison of the present study is made with those estimated for some parts of the world (Fig.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Workers like AKI (1969), HERRMANN (1980) and MITCHELL (1995) have used different approaches to quantify the attenuation relationship by applying different parts of the seismograms. A significant contribution has been made from seismic wave attenuation studies in India and other parts of the world by different authors using the coda waves from local earthquakes and employing the single backscattering model (HERRMANN, 1980;ROECKER et al, 1982;ROVELLI, 1982;PULLI, 1984;REHA, 1984;HAVSKOV et al, 1989;IBANEZ et al, 1990;PUJADES et al, 1991;WOODGOLD, 1994;AKINCI et al, 1994;HELLWEG et al, 1995;GUPTA et al, 1995GUPTA et al, , 1998GUPTA et al, and 2006AKINCI and EYIDOGAN, 1996;MANDAL and RASTOGI, 1998;SINGH et al, 2001;CASTRO et al, 2002;PAUL et al, 2003;GUPTA and KUMAR, 2002;KUMAR et al, 2005;SHARMA et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vol. 169, (2012) Estimation of Coda Wave Attenuation in the East Anatolia Fault Zone 1199 (AKI and CHOUET, 1975;ROECKER et al, 1982;HAVSKOV et al, 1989;IBANEZ et al, 1990;WOODGOLD, 1994;MITCHELL, 1995;GUPTA et al, 1998GUPTA et al, , 2006GIAMPICCOLA et al, 2002;KUMAR et al, 2005;SAHIN, 2008;MITCHELL et al, 2008;SHARMA et al, 2011). MORSY et al (2011 analyzed earthquakes data at different focal depths in the Gulf of Suez, Egypt.…”
Section: Frequency Dependence Of Q Cmentioning
confidence: 99%