2016
DOI: 10.4310/hha.2016.v18.n2.a17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cocommutative coalgebras: homotopy theory and Koszul duality

Abstract: We extend a construction of Hinich to obtain a closed model category structure on all differential graded cocommutative coalgebras over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. We further show that the Koszul duality between commutative and Lie algebras extends to a Quillen equivalence between cocommutative coalgebras and formal coproducts of curved Lie algebras.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the coalgebras were assumed to be conilpotent and this construction is not known in the completely general case. Further, Positselski worked with curved objects suggesting that in more general cases when discussing a Koszul duality one side of the Quillen equivalence should be a category consisting of curved objects; a hypothesis that is strengthened by results of [5] and this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the coalgebras were assumed to be conilpotent and this construction is not known in the completely general case. Further, Positselski worked with curved objects suggesting that in more general cases when discussing a Koszul duality one side of the Quillen equivalence should be a category consisting of curved objects; a hypothesis that is strengthened by results of [5] and this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In Section 4 the category of marked curved Lie algebras and curved morphisms is introduced. This category is similar to the category of curved Lie algebras with strict morphisms discussed in [5]. On the other hand, the morphisms are quite different and as such the category itself is quite different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations