2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06884-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cochlear implantation in common cavity deformity: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies subgroup the inner ear single cavities into three types according to their radiological appearance in the CT of the temporal bone [1,12,13]. First type is Michel's otocyst deformity, characterized by a single cyst and complete absence of the IAC and cochlear nerve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies subgroup the inner ear single cavities into three types according to their radiological appearance in the CT of the temporal bone [1,12,13]. First type is Michel's otocyst deformity, characterized by a single cyst and complete absence of the IAC and cochlear nerve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown audiological and speech benefits after CI surgery for IEM deformities, but these benefits are found to be inferior to those of CI surgery in patients with normal inner ears [8,9,13]. In general, several factors, such as age at implantation, cognitive ability, additional disability, residual hearing, parental participation, and the daily use of the cochlear implant audio processor, affect language development after CI [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Common cavity deformity patients could have long-term benefits with CI ( Al-mahboob et al, 2022 ). Although most studies have concluded that post-operative outcomes in CCD patients are worse than in children with normal inner ear structures and mild malformations, specific auditory speech rehabilitation outcomes are inconsistent ( Ahmad et al, 2005 ; Papsin, 2005 ; Ahn et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%