2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-07243-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cochlear implant in vestibular schwannomas: long-term outcomes and critical analysis of indications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Debate on treatment of small sporadic VS seems destined to continue as the lack of correct clinical studies and the inconclusive observational studies make it difficult to provide the patient with high-level evidence regarding the best clinical outcome with observation or active strategies (30). The opportunity to combine TLAB surgery with a cochlear implant has been recently investigated by several authors (31–34), and might become a factor in favor of proactive surgery . Other surgical approaches as retrosigmoid (2) and middle cranial fossa (35) are in principle hearing-sparing approaches and need to be considered as alternatives to TLAB when there are chances for hearing preservation (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debate on treatment of small sporadic VS seems destined to continue as the lack of correct clinical studies and the inconclusive observational studies make it difficult to provide the patient with high-level evidence regarding the best clinical outcome with observation or active strategies (30). The opportunity to combine TLAB surgery with a cochlear implant has been recently investigated by several authors (31–34), and might become a factor in favor of proactive surgery . Other surgical approaches as retrosigmoid (2) and middle cranial fossa (35) are in principle hearing-sparing approaches and need to be considered as alternatives to TLAB when there are chances for hearing preservation (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on experience, there have been cases where the cochlear nerve is unequivocally anatomically preserved after VS resection, but the patient does not receive successful stimulation. This suggests that factors such as less severe mechanical trauma (e.g., stretch), thermal injury from cautery, or vascular injury may affect the ability for the cochlear nerve to successfully conduct electrical signal (17,18). Other factors that may also play a role in some cases include cochlear fibrosis/ossification or cochlear nucleus (brainstem) trauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the other cases of small tumours, when HPS is deemed to have an unsuccessful outcome, observation remains the choice and, if growth is assessed, a prompt shift to TL surgery is recommended. Cochlear implant (CI) rehabilitation is considered in the case of preserved cochlear nerve 25 in early TL and failed HPS cases, whereas hearing aid rehabilitation can be an option in preserved-hearing cases. In clinical practice, when should surgery be performed for a small tumour?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%