“…However, calcifying coccolithophores and dimethylsulfide-producing (DMS) Phaeocystis have been found to contribute in a significant way to total phytoplankton biomass in summer/fall in the subantarctic (Balch et al, 2016;Nissen et al, 2018) and in spring/summer at high latitudes, respectively (Smith and Gordon, 1997;Arrigo et al, 1999Arrigo et al, , 2017DiTullio et al, 2000;Poulton et al, 2007), thus suggesting that the succession and competition of different plankton groups govern biogeochemical cycles at the (sub)regional scale. As climate change is expected to differentially impact the competitive fitness of different phytoplankton groups and ultimately their contribution to total net primary production (NPP; IPCC, 2014; Constable et al, 2014;Deppeler and Davidson, 2017) with a likely increase in the relative importance of coccolithophores and Phaeocystis in a warming world at the expense of diatoms (Bopp et al, 2005;Winter et al, 2013;Rivero-Calle et al, 2015), the resulting change in SO phytoplankton community structure is likely to affect global nutrient and carbon distributions, ocean carbon uptake, and marine food web structure (Smetacek et al, 2004). While a number of recent studies have elucidated the importance of coccolithophores for subantarctic carbon cycling (e.g., Rosengard et al, 2015;Balch et al, 2016;Nissen et al, 2018;Rigual Hernández et al, 2020), few estimates quantify the role of present and future highlatitude SO phytoplankton community structure for ecosystem services such as NPP and carbon export (e.g., Wang and Moore, 2011;Yager et al, 2016).…”