1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf02051969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coccidioidomycosis and histoplasmosis a review of their epidemiology and geographical distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since coccidioidal infection confers very longlived dermal hypersensitivity to antigen extracts of Coccidioides, these surveys measured the prevalence of prior exposure. These surveys thus provided estimates of the distribution of Coccidioides in the southwestern portion of the United States (31,32). Additionally, some counties in the Southwest had much higher proportions of skin reactivity: skin testing of long-term residents of single counties showed that in Arizona, Maricopa County (Phoenix), Pima County (Tucson), and Pinal County had over 70% positive skin test rates, compared to 10 to 40% in surrounding counties (33,34).…”
Section: Coccidioides In the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since coccidioidal infection confers very longlived dermal hypersensitivity to antigen extracts of Coccidioides, these surveys measured the prevalence of prior exposure. These surveys thus provided estimates of the distribution of Coccidioides in the southwestern portion of the United States (31,32). Additionally, some counties in the Southwest had much higher proportions of skin reactivity: skin testing of long-term residents of single counties showed that in Arizona, Maricopa County (Phoenix), Pima County (Tucson), and Pinal County had over 70% positive skin test rates, compared to 10 to 40% in surrounding counties (33,34).…”
Section: Coccidioides In the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In North America, the endemic regions are in the Midwestern and Southeastern of United States (1,53,136). In Latin America, the most prevalent areas are in Venezuela, Ecuador, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay and Argentina (13,136,140) (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These areas have been largely defined by clinical case prevalence, 14 isolation from soils, 15 or skin-reactivity tests to specific antigens of the dimorphic fungi. [16][17][18] Ecological aspects of soils that favor growth of the hyphal forms and/or animal or bird patterns for dispersal are thought to underlie dimorphic fungal pathogen endemicity.…”
Section: Dimorphism and Endemicitymentioning
confidence: 99%