2018
DOI: 10.5194/amt-11-1833-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COCAP: a carbon dioxide analyser for small unmanned aircraft systems

Abstract: Abstract. Unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) could provide a cost-effective way to close gaps in the observation of the carbon cycle, provided that small yet accurate analysers are available. We have developed a COmpact Carbon dioxide analyser for Airborne Platforms (COCAP). The accuracy of COCAP's carbon dioxide (CO2) measurements is ensured by calibration in an environmental chamber, regular calibration in the field and by chemical drying of sampled air. In addition, the package contains a lightweight thermal … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the study presented here, temperature, pressure, relative humidity and CO 2 dry-air mole fraction of ambient air were measured using COCAP, the COmpact Carbon dioxide analyser for Airborne Platforms, developed at the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry in Jena (see Kunz et al, 2018, for a detailed description). COCAP was mounted below the multicopter.…”
Section: Airborne Payloadmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the study presented here, temperature, pressure, relative humidity and CO 2 dry-air mole fraction of ambient air were measured using COCAP, the COmpact Carbon dioxide analyser for Airborne Platforms, developed at the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry in Jena (see Kunz et al, 2018, for a detailed description). COCAP was mounted below the multicopter.…”
Section: Airborne Payloadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ignoring noise and calibration error, any CO 2 signal x a is reported by COCAP as the convolution of x a with the CO 2 sensor's instrument function f (see Kunz et al, 2018):…”
Section: Correction For Response Time Of Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The flux footprint is calculated by integration over an array of mole fraction footprints for different measurement heights, i.e. analogous to Equation 11 term A and Equation 12: The uncertainty of COCAP's x CO2 measurements due to drift and calibration errors is about 1 µmol·mol −1 (Kunz et al, 2018).…”
Section: Footprint Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies include the investigation of temporal and spatial variations of atmospheric CO 2 using a unique CO 2 measurement device attached to a small UAV (kite plane) (Watai et al, 2006); atmospheric monitoring of point source fossil fuel CO 2 and CH 4 from a gas treatment plant using a Helikite (Turnbull et al, 2014); CO 2 , CH 4 , and H 2 O measurements on board the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Sensor Integrated Environmental Remote Research Aircraft (SIERRA) UAV (Berman et al, 2012); a small atmospheric sensor measuring CO 2 , CH 4 , and H 2 O attached to a robotic helicopter (Khan et al, 2012); the quantification of CH 4 mole fractions and isotopic compositions from heights up to 2700 m on Ascension Island using a remotely piloted octocopter (Lowry et al, 2015;Brownlow et al, 2016); and a dedicated CO 2 analyzer, COmpact Carbon dioxide analyzer for Airborne Platforms (CO-CAP), capable of being flown onboard small UAVs (Kunz et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%