2013
DOI: 10.1002/jeab.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cocaine Versus Food Choice Procedure in Rats: Environmental Manipulations and Effects of Amphetamine

Abstract: We have adapted a nonhuman primate model of cocaine versus food choice to the rat species. To evaluate the procedure, we tested cocaine versus food choice under a variety of environmental manipulations as well as pharmacological pretreatments. Complete cocaine-choice dose-effect curves (0–1.0 mg/kg/infusion) were obtained for each condition under concurrent fixed ratio schedules of reinforcement. Percentage of responding emitted on the cocaine-reinforced lever was not affected significantly by removal of cocai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

29
107
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(102 reference statements)
29
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, all else being equal, merely shortening the interchoice interval from 10 to 1 min was sufficient to make rats shift their choice from saccharin to cocaine within one single 30-trial choice session. This setting-specific control of cocaine choices in the same rats and at the same dose of cocaine (ie, 0.25 mg per injection) confirms previous research (Kerstetter et al, 2012) and helps to resolve current discrepancies across cocaine choice studies in rats, as explained in the Introduction Thomsen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, all else being equal, merely shortening the interchoice interval from 10 to 1 min was sufficient to make rats shift their choice from saccharin to cocaine within one single 30-trial choice session. This setting-specific control of cocaine choices in the same rats and at the same dose of cocaine (ie, 0.25 mg per injection) confirms previous research (Kerstetter et al, 2012) and helps to resolve current discrepancies across cocaine choice studies in rats, as explained in the Introduction Thomsen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Remarkably, a complete and long-term suppression of methamphetamine seeking by food choice was also demonstrated in rats after different histories of extended access to methamphetamine self-administration that are known to induce addiction-like behavior (Caprioli et al, 2015a, b). In contrast, in other choice studies, rats eventually shifted their choice from sweet reward to cocaine when the dose of cocaine was sufficiently high (ie, up to 0.5 mg per injection) (Thomsen et al, 2008(Thomsen et al, , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One example of this pharmacotherapy approach is studies with the dopamine/norepinephrine-selective releaser d-amphetamine. Chronic d-amphetamine treatment produced dose-dependent and sustained decreases in cocaine self-administration under second-order, progressive-ratio, and concurrent drug vs food schedules of reinforcement in rats (Chiodo et al, 2008;Thomsen et al, 2012), nonhuman primates (Czoty et al, 2011;Negus, 2003;Negus and Mello, 2003), and/or humans (Greenwald et al, 2010;Rush et al, 2010). Overall, these studies demonstrate that cocaine self-administration in general, and cocaine vs food choice in particular, is sensitive to pharmacological manipulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%