2000
DOI: 10.1007/s002130000427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects of heroin in squirrel monkeys: role of active metabolites and opioid receptor mechanisms

Abstract: These results suggest that heroin and its deacetylated metabolites engendered cocaine-like DS effects in a similar fashion. Furthermore, the cocaine-like DS effects of these opioids were modulated by a predominantly mu-opioid receptor mechanism.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this experiment, receptor theory would predict that increasing naltrexone fixed-dose pretreatments would produce parallel rightward shifts in the fentanyl dose-effect function. The present results were consistent with this hypothesis, and the naltrexone pA 2 values reported in this study were consistent with previous naltrexone studies in monkeys (Rowlett et al, 2000;Bowen et al, 2002; Gerak and France, 2007). Overall, these results provide an empirical foundation to interpret the antinociceptive effects of fixedproportion fentanyl and naltrexone mixtures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this experiment, receptor theory would predict that increasing naltrexone fixed-dose pretreatments would produce parallel rightward shifts in the fentanyl dose-effect function. The present results were consistent with this hypothesis, and the naltrexone pA 2 values reported in this study were consistent with previous naltrexone studies in monkeys (Rowlett et al, 2000;Bowen et al, 2002; Gerak and France, 2007). Overall, these results provide an empirical foundation to interpret the antinociceptive effects of fixedproportion fentanyl and naltrexone mixtures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The findings of the present study confirm that heroin has full or partial cocainelike DS effects in a sizeable proportion of subjects trained to discriminate cocaine, an observation consistent with other studies (e.g., Mello et al, 1995;Negus et al, 1998;Rowlett et al, 2000. These results suggest that although heroin and cocaine are pharmacologically distinct, they can share interoceptive effects in cocaine-trained monkeys.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For example, in drug discrimination procedures, which provide information relevant to understanding a drug's interoceptive effects, stimulants and opioids often engender shared discriminative stimulus (DS) effects. In this regard, various opioid agonists have been shown to engender partial or full substitution for cocaine in the majority of monkeys trained to discriminate cocaine from vehicle (Mello et al, 1995;Negus et al, 1998;Rowlett et al, 2000Rowlett et al, , 2001. Because shared DS effects of drugs often correspond closely with overlapping mechanisms of action, these findings suggest commonalities in the neuropharmacological mechanisms underlying transduction of the DS effects of stimulants and opioids.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is evidenced by the finding that stimulant drugs and opiates do not necessarily substitute for each other in drug discrimination tasks (Dykstra et al, 1992) and, when they do, they do so asymmetrically. Hence, opiates can substitute for the µ-opiate receptor-dependent component of the discriminative properties of cocaine (Rowlett et al, 2000) and can potentiate the discriminative properties of cocaine (Suzuki et al, 1995). Cocaine, by contrast, does not substitute for, and does not influence, the discriminative properties of opiates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this role of the AIC may be restricted to stimulant drugs having distinctive peripheral and anxiogenic effects (Mitchell et al, 1996). Opiates do not fully substitute for stimulant drugs in drug discrimination tasks (Negus et al, 1998;Rowlett et al, 2000;Rowlett et al, 2004), suggesting differences in the peripheral versus central nature of the reinforcing effects of these different classes of drug. Whether the AIC influences the loss of control over intake of opiates that lack the acute peripheral effects of stimulants after they have been self-administered has been investigated in the present study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%