2016
DOI: 10.1097/fbp.0000000000000182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cocaine-induced reward enhancement measured with intracranial self-stimulation in rats bred for low versus high saccharin intake

Abstract: Rats selectively bred for high (HiS) or low (LoS) saccharin intake are a well-established model of drug abuse vulnerability, with HiS rats being more likely to consume sweets and cocaine (Carroll et al. 2002) than LoS rats. Still, the nature of these differences is poorly understood. This study examined whether the motivational consequences of cocaine exposure are differentially expressed in HiS and LoS rats by measuring intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) thresholds following acute injections of cocaine (10 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the histamine findings, in other studies, adult rats had more severe withdrawal effects than adolescent rats ( 232 , 233 ). This was in contrast to findings that adolescent rats self-administering cocaine were more sensitive to the rewarding effects of drug ( 52 , 120 ) and showed more severe relapse effects than adult rats ( 18 ). These findings highlight opposite effects that can occur in groups of rats when considering the rewarding vs. aversive effects as previously discussed by Riley ( 234 ), and they emphasize the importance of considering individual differences in vulnerability to drug abuse and response to treatment.…”
Section: Sex Differences In the Effect Of Novel Treatments For Behavicontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with the histamine findings, in other studies, adult rats had more severe withdrawal effects than adolescent rats ( 232 , 233 ). This was in contrast to findings that adolescent rats self-administering cocaine were more sensitive to the rewarding effects of drug ( 52 , 120 ) and showed more severe relapse effects than adult rats ( 18 ). These findings highlight opposite effects that can occur in groups of rats when considering the rewarding vs. aversive effects as previously discussed by Riley ( 234 ), and they emphasize the importance of considering individual differences in vulnerability to drug abuse and response to treatment.…”
Section: Sex Differences In the Effect Of Novel Treatments For Behavicontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…( 22 , 25 , 26 , 28 )]. In a recent study in our laboratory, the findings of SACC preference predicting drug self-administration were extended to other measures of reward, such ICSS, and HiS rats showed more cocaine-induced reward enhancement of intracranial self-stimulation than LoS rats ( 120 ). Converging results from many of these studies suggest that avidity for sweets and drug-taking behaviors are closely related, heritable, and substitutable ( 22 , 25 , 114 ), and they likely operate through common neural mechanisms [e.g., Ref.…”
Section: Sex Differences In Compulsive Sweet Consumption As a Predictmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the second experiment, cocaine facilitated ICSS response and reduced the ICSS thresholds and M 50 values ( Figure 3 ). These data parallel other findings; cocaine enhanced the brain stimulation reward [ 7 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. In contrast, HT7 acupuncture did not alter the threshold-lowering effects of cocaine, indicating that HT7 stimulation does not affect the reward-facilitating effects of cocaine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For example, human users of cocaine describe an initial state of energy and euphoria followed in time by a “crash” that is characterized by feelings of anxiety craving and agitation (e.g., Anthony et al, 1989; Gawin and Ellinwood, 1988; Williamson et al, 1997). These dual positive and negative effects of the drug have also been observed in animal studies where cocaine is readily self-administered (Ettenberg et al, 1982; Foltin and Fischman, 1994; Goeders, 1988; Roberts et al, 1977; Wolverton, 1992), produces conditioned place preferences (Bardo, et al, 1995; Ettenberg, 2004; Mueller and Stewart, 2000; Mucha et al, 1982; Tzschentke, 1998), and reduces the threshold for rewarding brain stimulation (Ahmed et al 2002; Radke et al, 2016). In contrast, cocaine has also been shown to produce enhanced anxiety in a variety of tests including the elevated plus maze (Rogerio and Takahashi, 1992; Yang et al, 1992; Ben-Shahar et al, 2008), acoustic startle test (Willick and Kokkinidis, 1995), and in conditioned taste aversion studies (Goudie et al, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%