2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300420
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cocaine Dependence and D2 Receptor Availability in the Functional Subdivisions of the Striatum: Relationship with Cocaine-Seeking Behavior

Abstract: Striatal dopamine D 2 receptors have been implicated in the neurobiology of cocaine addiction. Previous imaging studies showed reduced striatal D 2 receptor availability in chronic cocaine abusers, and animal studies suggested that low D 2 receptor availability promotes cocaine self-administration. Here, D 2 receptor availability was assessed with positron emission tomography (PET) and [ 11 C]raclopride in the limbic, associative, and sensori-motor subdivisions of the striatum in 17 recently detoxified chronic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
164
6
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
20
164
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the buprenorphine/naloxone combination was self-administered even at doses that produced no statistically significant increases in subjective responses. [Similar results (i.e., drug self-administration in the absence of changes in subjective responses) have been reported for morphine (Lamb et al, 1991) and for cocaine (Martinez et al, 2004).] When participants were asked why they self-administered buprenorphine/naloxone when they felt no measurable subjective effects, they reported that they slept better that night or that they had less muscle pain.…”
Section: Direct Assessments Of the Reinforcing Effects Of Test Compoundssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Interestingly, the buprenorphine/naloxone combination was self-administered even at doses that produced no statistically significant increases in subjective responses. [Similar results (i.e., drug self-administration in the absence of changes in subjective responses) have been reported for morphine (Lamb et al, 1991) and for cocaine (Martinez et al, 2004).] When participants were asked why they self-administered buprenorphine/naloxone when they felt no measurable subjective effects, they reported that they slept better that night or that they had less muscle pain.…”
Section: Direct Assessments Of the Reinforcing Effects Of Test Compoundssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…It is clear, therefore, that to determine the nature of the relationship between the increase in D2 High receptors and any specific change in behavior or psychological process, including behavioral sensitization, will require examination of a greater range of cocaine doses, treatment regimens and conditions. Nevertheless, it is important to contrast the increase in striatal D2 High receptors produced by cocaine self-administration experience reported here with reports that there is a decrease in striatal D2 receptors in cocaine addicts (Volkow et al, 1990;Martinez et al, 2004) and in non-human primates allowed to self-administer cocaine (Volkow, et al, 1990, Volkow, et al, 1993, Martinez, et al, 2004, Nader and Czoty, 2005, Nader, et al, 2006. We did not find a decrease in the total number of D2 receptors, and therefore, there was presumably a decrease in the number of D2 receptors in the low-affinity state proportionate to the increase in D2 High receptors.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…A consistent finding from imaging studies is that cocaine addicts show a small but very persistent decrease in dorsal striatal dopamine D2 receptors (Volkow, et al, 1990, Martinez, et al, 2004, Volkow, et al, 2004, and studies in non-human primates report similar decreases following cocaine self-administration, suggesting that this may be a consequence of cocaine use Czoty, 2005, Nader, et al, 2006). However, a long-standing puzzle in this area is that preclinical studies have consistently found that rats treated with amphetamine or cocaine, and then withdrawn, are hypersensitive to the psychomotor activating and incentive motivational effects of these "indirect agonists" (Robinson and Berridge, 1993), and even more importantly, to the psychomotor effects of direct-acting D2 agonists (Ujike, et al, 1990, De Vries, et al, 2002, Edwards, et al, 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There are multiple lines of evidence that cocaine dependence is associated with a decrease in D 2 receptor binding [164-167], a pattern that seems to persist after disease remission [165]. Decreases in D 2 receptor binding have also been found in heroin addiction [168], alcohol dependence [169,170], methamphetamine abuse [171,172], prompting a number of researchers to posit that low D 2 receptor availability may serve as a biomarker for substance abuse, potentially reflecting an altered sensitivity to various rewards [173-175].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%