2022
DOI: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056003709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cobertura dos dados de fluoreto em sistemas de abastecimento de água usando o software R

Abstract: OBJETIVO Apresentar um protocolo para a crítica dos dados sobre monitoramento do fluoreto na água com recursos de programação do software R, ilustrando sua aplicação para descrever a cobertura dos dados e a qualidade da fluoretação em 2015. MÉTODOS Foi utilizado big data proveniente do Sistema de Informação de Vigilância da Qualidade da Água para Consumo Humano que incluía todos os municípios brasileiros. Os procedimentos de crítica dos dados foram realizados com auxílio do software R. Aplicaram-se filtros par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a significant limitation arises from the absence of direct water sample collection data from the distribution networks of WSS in the North, Northeast, and Central-West regions. Respectively, only 1.0, 13.9, and 9.6% of municipalities in these regions had health surveillance records on fluoride concentration in WSS 8 . The availability of such records would facilitate comparison with the self-declared data provided by both information sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, a significant limitation arises from the absence of direct water sample collection data from the distribution networks of WSS in the North, Northeast, and Central-West regions. Respectively, only 1.0, 13.9, and 9.6% of municipalities in these regions had health surveillance records on fluoride concentration in WSS 8 . The availability of such records would facilitate comparison with the self-declared data provided by both information sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%