2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cobalt-doped molybdenum disulfide in-situ grown on graphite paper with excellent electrocatalytic activity for triiodide evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the difference of binding energy between Mo 3d 5/2 and Co 2p 3/2 (~550.00 eV) is a useful standard to judge whether the CoMoS phase formed. [31][32][33] For the obtained CoP/ CoMoS/CC, this value is 550.29 eV, further confirming the existence of Co 0.75 Mo 3 S 3.75 phase. In Figure 3c, the two distinct peaks at 161.91 and 163.38 eV are attributed to S 2À and the other two peaks at 163.52 and 164.84 eV belong to apical S 2À or bridging S 2 2À .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the difference of binding energy between Mo 3d 5/2 and Co 2p 3/2 (~550.00 eV) is a useful standard to judge whether the CoMoS phase formed. [31][32][33] For the obtained CoP/ CoMoS/CC, this value is 550.29 eV, further confirming the existence of Co 0.75 Mo 3 S 3.75 phase. In Figure 3c, the two distinct peaks at 161.91 and 163.38 eV are attributed to S 2À and the other two peaks at 163.52 and 164.84 eV belong to apical S 2À or bridging S 2 2À .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In addition, the difference of binding energy between Mo 3d 5/2 and Co 2p 3/2 (∼550.00 eV) is a useful standard to judge whether the CoMoS phase formed [31–33] . For the obtained CoP/CoMoS/CC, this value is 550.29 eV, further confirming the existence of Co 0.75 Mo 3 S 3.75 phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The abundant catalytic active sites, superior carrier transfer properties of graphene, and low resistance of MoS 2 @RGO lead to a good PCE of 6.82%, which is better than that of Pt counter electrode DSSCs (6.44%). GP was also a great candidate as substrate, as reported by Zheng et al 166 The MoS 2 /GP counter electrode has shown a smaller series resistance for I 3 − reduction in compare with that of Pt/FTO counter electrode. In order to increase the photoelectric conversion efficiency and improve the electrical conductivity of the counter electrode, the Co doping process has also been employed.…”
Section: Ws2 and Mos2 In Dsscmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…[92] Inspired by this, Zheng et al successfully prepared the Co-doped MoS 2 in situ grown on graphite paper substrate (Co-MoS 2 /GP) by the simple decomposition method. [93] The doped Co atoms become the mainly catalytic active centers for I 3…”
Section: Heteroatom Effect On Sulfides (Oxides)mentioning
confidence: 99%