2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cobalt doped iron phosphate thin film: An effective catalyst for electrochemical water splitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For MS‐3, MS‐7, and MS‐12 samples, the calculated average pore diameter is 35.62, 39.97, and 37.30 nm, respectively, whereas the average pore volume is 0.081, 0.012, and 0.078 cc/g, respectively. High surface area and mesoporous nature with a large pore volume of MS‐3 sample can afford more electroactive sites and fast ion transport during electrochemical reactions 55,56 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For MS‐3, MS‐7, and MS‐12 samples, the calculated average pore diameter is 35.62, 39.97, and 37.30 nm, respectively, whereas the average pore volume is 0.081, 0.012, and 0.078 cc/g, respectively. High surface area and mesoporous nature with a large pore volume of MS‐3 sample can afford more electroactive sites and fast ion transport during electrochemical reactions 55,56 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrochemical OER catalytic performance of MoS 2 electrodes was investigated in 1 M KOH (pH = 13.7) aqueous electrolyte using standard three‐electrode configurations with platinum and Hg/HgO as counter and reference electrodes, respectively. All recorded potentials during the analysis were converted to reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) potentials using the following equation 56 : VRHE=VHg/HgO+pH×0.059+VHg/HgO0, Where VHg/HgO indicates applied potential vs Hg/HgO and VHg/HgO0 (0.098 V) represents the standard potential of Hg/HgO vs NHE. The linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves (IR corrected) shown in Figure 7A were recorded within the potential range of 1.0 to 1.7 V vs RHE at a scan rate of 1 mV/s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 Recently, transition metal phosphate-derived materials have been perceived as promising materials for electrocatalysis owing to their tunable porous structure that enhances oxygen permeability. 17 The proton accepting tendency of the phosphate group allows the metal to be oxidized more easily, which induces structural changes and favours water oxidation, 18,19 as a result of which phosphate-based catalysts are more recognized for their alkaline OER. Existing Fe-based phosphate catalysts are still on a less competitive level compared to Mn and Co phosphates with respect to their ORR performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, Khalate et al developed a Co doped iron phosphate (Fe 11.78 P 8 O 40 ) microsphere film on a stainless steel (SS) substrate for water oxidation, which exhibited an overpotential value of 266 mV at a 10 mA cm À2 current density in 1 M KOH electrolyte. 15 Khalate et al also developed a Fe 2.95 (PO 4 ) 2 (OH) 2 film on SS substrate for an OER exhibiting an Z 10 value of 283 mV. 16 Later, Fe-doped Co 2 (PO 4 ) 3 Á8H 2 O microflowers were fabricated by Wang et al and it was found to be an efficient electrocatalyst for OER with an overpotential value of 273 mV at 10 mA cm À2 in 1 M KOH.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%