2011
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coaxial waveguide MRI

Abstract: As ultrahigh-field MR imaging systems suffer from the standing wave problems of conventional coil designs, the use of antenna systems that generate travelling waves was suggested. As a modification to the original approach, we propose the use of a coaxial waveguide configuration with interrupted inner conductor. This concept can focus the radiofrequency energy to the desired imaging region in the human body and can operate at different Larmor frequencies without hardware modifications, as it is not limited by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower B 1 + transmission efficiency of the TW excitation is due to a smaller B 1 + filling factor for the volume-of-interest. In comparison with volume resonators, the according B 1 + transmission efficiency decreases—a finding also reported by other groups [30],[31]—which constitutes the main disadvantage of the TW excitation approach. The 37% B 1 + transmission efficiency gap between both imaging approaches increases dramatically to approx.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The lower B 1 + transmission efficiency of the TW excitation is due to a smaller B 1 + filling factor for the volume-of-interest. In comparison with volume resonators, the according B 1 + transmission efficiency decreases—a finding also reported by other groups [30],[31]—which constitutes the main disadvantage of the TW excitation approach. The 37% B 1 + transmission efficiency gap between both imaging approaches increases dramatically to approx.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This according transmit efficiency measured in the 7 T MRI system is only around 2 times smaller than those obtained for standard clinical 3 T MRI systems (B 1 + Tx_eff = 8.4 μT∙(kW) -0.5 measured at a 3 T Siemens Trio MRI body coil. Compared to other recent approaches destined to whole-body imaging, like coaxial waveguide MRI [ 23 ] or travelling-wave approach [ 20 ], the in vivo B 1 + transmit efficiency of our MRAS is approximately twice as high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This approach yields a sufficiently uniform B 1 + field distribution for the imaging of a human extremity (leg) [ 20 ] or for neuroimaging of smaller non-human primates [ 21 ], thus enabling the imaging at VoIs of intermediate size. Unfortunately, the B 1 + transmit efficiency, i.e., the required RF energy to generate the B 1 + field is lower than that of both the body coils conventionally used in clinical 3 T MRI systems [ 22 ] and of the UHF body-part volume resonators of birdcage architecture [ 23 , 24 ]. Usually, birdcage volume coils confine the RF energy in the structure enclosed by the RF coil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traveling wave (TW) MRI is a far-field imaging technique that relies on rf mode propagation in a cylindrical magnet bore utilized as an rf waveguide. This approach was originally experimentally demonstrated at 7 T 17 and at clinically relevant field of 3 T 18,19 . However, the main challenge for the TW propagation in most conventional MRI scanners and spectrometers is the relatively small bore radius-to-wavelength ratio (a/λ) even at ultra-high field strengths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%