2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.607216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coastal Upwelling Limitation by Onshore Geostrophic Flow in the Gulf of Guinea Around the Niger River Plume

Abstract: Wind-driven coastal upwelling can be compensated by onshore geostrophic flow, and river plumes are associated with such flow. We investigate possible limitation of the northeast Gulf of Guinea upwelling by the Niger River plume, using regional ocean model simulations with or without river and dynamical upwelling indices. Here, the upwelling is weakened by 50% due to an onshore geostrophic flow equally controlled by alongshore thermosteric and halosteric sea-level changes. The river contributes to only 20% of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the TUG region, only changes in the meridional advection due to changes in both onshore geostrophic and Ekman meridional currents were responsible for the warm SST event in 2010 (Figures 11 and 12). Changes in the onshore meridional geostrophic current are caused by the alongshore sea surface height anomalies (Alory et al, 2021) while the changes in meridional Ekman current are due to the weakening of the zonal wind stress (not shown). All these findings highlight the major role played by wind stress changes in the 2010 SST warming and are in agreement with the suggestions of Lefèvre et al (2013).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the TUG region, only changes in the meridional advection due to changes in both onshore geostrophic and Ekman meridional currents were responsible for the warm SST event in 2010 (Figures 11 and 12). Changes in the onshore meridional geostrophic current are caused by the alongshore sea surface height anomalies (Alory et al, 2021) while the changes in meridional Ekman current are due to the weakening of the zonal wind stress (not shown). All these findings highlight the major role played by wind stress changes in the 2010 SST warming and are in agreement with the suggestions of Lefèvre et al (2013).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MLD is defined as the depth where the density increase compared to density at 10 m equals 0.03 kg m −3 . The density criterion used to calculate MLD is the one recommended by de Boyer Montégut et al (2004) and previously used in several studies in the region (e.g., Alory et al, 2021;Da-Allada et al, 2014;Jouanno et al, 2011Jouanno et al, , 2017. However, this criterion does not take into account the (rare) cases where the MLD is shallower than 10 m. The meridional current V is decomposed into geostrophic and Ekman components.…”
Section: Model Mixed-layer Heat Budgetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for probably spurious local freshening at a few points along the coast in SMAP RSS, SMOS BEC and SMAP RSS largely agree with GLORYS on the large-scale meridional gradient between 40°S and 32°S. Note that, while some upwelling regions are associated with coastal SSS increase [75,76], others are associated with coastal freshening (e.g., [77]). The mean vertical salinity gradients are indeed different and can be of opposite sign in the four major EBUS [78].…”
Section: Great Australian Bightmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Note that, while some upwelling regions are associated with coastal SSS increase [75,76], others are associated with coastal freshening (e.g., [77]). The mean vertical salinity…”
Section: California Upwelling Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inside the river plume, the circulation is mainly in geostrophic balance as observed (Mazzini et al, 2019;Alory et al, 2021) and modeled in other buoyant plumes (Nof and Pichevin, 2001;Ou et al, 2009;Schiller et al, 2011). Locally, the circulation in the river plume is ageostrophic [R o ∼ O(1)].…”
Section: River Plume Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 97%