1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(98)00131-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coastal risk perception: a case study in Aveiro District, Portugal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the geographic location represents a decisive factor to risk perception. Similar results have been obtained by Carvalho and Coelho (1998), Brody and Highfield (2004) and Teka and Vogt (2010), underlining that the geographical location influences the perception of inhabitants from different regions. Indeed, the geographical location determines the accessibility to infrastructures and media and thus of information.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Indeed, the geographic location represents a decisive factor to risk perception. Similar results have been obtained by Carvalho and Coelho (1998), Brody and Highfield (2004) and Teka and Vogt (2010), underlining that the geographical location influences the perception of inhabitants from different regions. Indeed, the geographical location determines the accessibility to infrastructures and media and thus of information.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This could be justified by the fact that visitors know what beach erosion is from the theoretical point of view but fail to recognise erosion effects and symptoms on the beach they use, particularly the consequences for people living on the seafront. As regards this last point, several studies in Europe have highlighted that residents have little awareness of the risks associated with coastal erosion and there is often an expectation that engineering structures paid for from public funds should be implemented to protect private properties (Carvalho and Coelh, 1998;Corrina Dahm Economos, 2002). This expectation could be modified by local authorities or stakeholders who could (perhaps should) promote not only a better and more responsible use of coastal resources but also a lower demand for these resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the results it seems clear that respondents perceive coastal defences to be necessary, even though no significant signs of erosion are easily visible in the Nestos Delta area. According to Carvalho and Coelh (1998), respondents' preference about the different coastal defence structures could be related to the type (natural versus urban) and the status (reflective versus dissipative) of the beach, and to respondent's residence (along the coast or not). Even though the cost of these structures may be perceived as high, in four Regions out of five, the majority of respondents believe that it is justified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coastal erosion is a natural process that turns into a risk when affects human activities and infrastructures. According to Cooper and McKenna [178], several studies have demonstrated a low awareness among coastal residents of the risks associated with coastal erosion and an expectation that publicly funded engineering structures can and should be emplaced to protect property [179,180]. When private property is threatened by coastal erosion, local owners pretend that society (the state) should intervene in some way because such position was adopted in past decades when much coastal defense has been undertaken at public expense.…”
Section: Government Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%