2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2011.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coastal Rapid Environmental Assessment in the Northern Adriatic Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Simoncelli et al (2011) we prescribe constant salinity values at all river mouths parametrizing the effects of tidal mixing inside the river estuaries. Values chosen are equal to 15 psu for all rivers, except for the Po river where 17 psu is considered.…”
Section: River Parameterization In the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following Simoncelli et al (2011) we prescribe constant salinity values at all river mouths parametrizing the effects of tidal mixing inside the river estuaries. Values chosen are equal to 15 psu for all rivers, except for the Po river where 17 psu is considered.…”
Section: River Parameterization In the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values chosen are equal to 15 psu for all rivers, except for the Po river where 17 psu is considered. These constant salinity values are the result of sensitivity tests performed on the basis of salinity profiles measured at river mouths (Simoncelli et al 2011) and at the center of the basin (Oddo et al 2005). …”
Section: River Parameterization In the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that the reproduction of the correct topography, taking into account the small islands, that in a low-resolution model, such as MFS, are not correctly resolved, together with the initialization procedure are key configurations settings that should be correctly tuned. Regarding the initialization procedure, the general practice would suggest to choose the spin-up time which allows the ocean model to reach a state of physical equilibrium (Simoncelli et al 2011). On the other hand, as we found in this work, using a longer spin-up time, the IRENOM model is free to develop its own dynamics, but possibly introducing greater uncertainties when the model moves away from the MFS initial conditions (corrected using data assimilation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A greater spin-up time causes the development of stronger currents especially south of Elba Island and finer spatial scales have a greater time to develop, as is the case of the circulation pattern north of Elba Island. To decide which spin-up time should be used, the general practice (Simoncelli et al 2011) would suggest to choose the spin-up time which allows the ocean model to reach a state of physical equilibrium, i.e., Total Kinetic Energy (TKE) plateau reached. Figure 9 shows the ratio between the (TKE), on the target day 14 February at 12:00 UTC, of the relocatable model and that of the father model MFS as a function of the spin-up time.…”
Section: Validation Of the Relocatable Model Using Drifters Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered the 20 monthly mean climatological river runoffs (Verri et al, 2017) River inflow surface salinity values were fixed to a constant value of 15 psu next to the river mouths, following the sensitivity tests carried out with the MFS parent model and the results of sensitivity tests performed by Simoncelli et al (2011) on the basis of salinity profiles measured in the shelf areas close to river outlets. This value has also been adopted in other studies on the Adriatic circulation, giving a realistic salinity profile for the open sea (Oddo et al, 2005).…”
Section: Surface Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%