2011
DOI: 10.1101/gr.114488.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coassembly of REST and its cofactors at sites of gene repression in embryonic stem cells

Abstract: The differentiation of pluripotent embryonic stem cells is regulated by networks of activating and repressing transcription factors that orchestrate determinate patterns of gene expression. With the recent mapping of target sites for many transcription factors, it has been a conundrum that so few of the genes directly targeted by these factors are transcriptionally responsive to the binding of that factor. To address this, we generated genome-wide maps of the transcriptional repressor REST and five of its core… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
58
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The enrichment or depletion of DNA-binding proteins at a given promoter site depends not only on the cellular or nuclear abundance, but also on binding affinity of the regulatory element for the binding protein (Bruce et al, 2009;Yu et al, 2011). An additional and nontrivial point to account for the increased REST affinity is that of multivalency, the situation in which two or more DNA-binding proteins or epigenetic marks bound at the same promoter act synergistically to promote repression (or activation) and alter the affinity/ capacity for a given DNA-binding protein, relative to the affinity observed in the absence of the marks (Ruthenburg et al, 2007).…”
Section: Transcriptional Regulation By Rest During Strokementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enrichment or depletion of DNA-binding proteins at a given promoter site depends not only on the cellular or nuclear abundance, but also on binding affinity of the regulatory element for the binding protein (Bruce et al, 2009;Yu et al, 2011). An additional and nontrivial point to account for the increased REST affinity is that of multivalency, the situation in which two or more DNA-binding proteins or epigenetic marks bound at the same promoter act synergistically to promote repression (or activation) and alter the affinity/ capacity for a given DNA-binding protein, relative to the affinity observed in the absence of the marks (Ruthenburg et al, 2007).…”
Section: Transcriptional Regulation By Rest During Strokementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the more highly bound genomic regions include most known and probable functional targets, whereas the lowest-occupancy DNA binding events generally do not appear to be involved in the cis-regulation of transcription (1,3,7,8). For example, in studies of Drosophila blastoderm patterning transcription factors we determined that genomic regions only bound at low occupancy have some of the following characteristics: proximity to genes whose biological functions are not associated with the bound transcription factors; proximity to genes that are not spatially regulated or not transcribed in early embryos; and mapping to poorly conserved sequences or protein coding sequences (6,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been mostly studied as a suppressor of important neural genes in embryonic stem cells (ESCs), neural progenitors, and other non-neural systems. Its function in neuronal cells, however, seems to be more complex and dependent on contexts [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] To better understand the roles of REST in regulating neural programs and how its cistrome has evolved, Rockowitz and Zheng recently compared genome-wide REST occupancy in human and mouse ESCs, using data from chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with deep sequencing (ChIP-seq). They identified significant expansion of REST binding in human ESCs (hESCs) compared with its binding in mouse ESCs (mESCs) (8,199 occurrences in human versus 4,107 in mice).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%