2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coarsening of complex microstructures following spinodal decomposition

Abstract: Coarsening plays a pivotal role in materials engineering, but our understanding of the dynamics of coarsening in morphologically complex systems is still limited. In this paper, we examine the correlations between the interfacial velocity and interfacial morphologies, and then predict the evolution of mean curvature based on the correlations. Three simulated structures with varying volume fractions, two bicontinuous and one nonbicontinuous, are generated using the Cahn-Hilliard equation. We find general correl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To control the characteristics of the resulting porous bicontinuous microstructures, we fix the average fill fraction at 50% and tune the surface energy of the interface between the two phases to modify the resulting feature morphology. Drawing inspiration from nanoporous foams and block copolymers with morphology and directionality that can be controlled by properly choosing the alloying (40,41) or mixing ratios (42), we computed anisotropic shell architectures that mimic such directional tunability (43). Specifically, we prescribed an anisotropic surface energy γ(n) as a function of the surface normal n to penalize growth along a particular set of directions defined by {m1, .…”
Section: Parameter Space Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To control the characteristics of the resulting porous bicontinuous microstructures, we fix the average fill fraction at 50% and tune the surface energy of the interface between the two phases to modify the resulting feature morphology. Drawing inspiration from nanoporous foams and block copolymers with morphology and directionality that can be controlled by properly choosing the alloying (40,41) or mixing ratios (42), we computed anisotropic shell architectures that mimic such directional tunability (43). Specifically, we prescribed an anisotropic surface energy γ(n) as a function of the surface normal n to penalize growth along a particular set of directions defined by {m1, .…”
Section: Parameter Space Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a full description of surface curvature is typically built on two variables, such as the pair of principal curvatures, we quantified the interface shape distributions (ISD) for different curvature measures. These types of 2D probability density maps have been used to characterize the morphological evolution of spinodal decomposition systems during coarsening [28,29].…”
Section: Curvature Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of the interface shape distributions (ISD), this implied that the ratio of the face areas with a certain combination of curvature to the total mesh area was considered. For example, in case of the ISD of the principal curvature, this means [28]:…”
Section: Curvature Probability Density Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mechanism is commonly observed in the growth of thin films [13] and quantum dots [12]. In the following, we numerically predict the formation of bi-continuous phase networks through anisotropic spinodal decomposition, and we analyse the resulting structures in terms of their morphology and topology [7,[14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As a quantitative measure of the morphology of microstructures resulting from anisotropic spinodal decomposition, we derive the interfacial shape distribution (ISD) on contours of constant ϕ = 0.5 within the RVE. The ISD is used to investigate self-similarity of bi-continuous structures and is related to the genus or the topology of microstructures [14][15][16]. Representative interface contours are visualized in figure 5a-d.…”
Section: (D) Interface Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%